HOIBX vs. PCGTX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HOIBX (Homestead Intermediate Bond Fund) and PCGTX (PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, HOIBX returned -0.12%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for PCGTX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HOIBX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for PCGTX.

Performance

HOIBX vs. PCGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Homestead Intermediate Bond Fund (HOIBX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOIBX achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than PCGTX's 2.92% return.

HOIBX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: -0.02%
• 6M: 0.28%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: 3.75%
• 5Y*: -0.12%
• 10Y*: —

PCGTX

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 2.92%
• 6M: 3.12%
• 1Y: 8.12%
• 3Y*: 4.76%
• 5Y*: 0.36%
• 10Y*: 1.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOIBX vs. PCGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HOIBX Homestead Intermediate Bond Fund	-0.02%	6.55%	1.69%	5.75%	-13.38%	-1.13%	8.70%	4.68%
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments	2.92%	7.84%	0.98%	5.12%	-13.48%	-0.61%	5.75%	3.79%

Correlation

The correlation between HOIBX and PCGTX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019	0.80

The correlation between HOIBX and PCGTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HOIBX vs. PCGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOIBX

HOIBX Risk / Return Rank: 16
HOIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
HOIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
HOIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
HOIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
HOIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

PCGTX

PCGTX Risk / Return Rank: 49
PCGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
PCGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PCGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
PCGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PCGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOIBX vs. PCGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Homestead Intermediate Bond Fund (HOIBX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HOIBX	PCGTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	1.60	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	2.78	-1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.35	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	2.91	-1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.73	9.45	-5.72

HOIBX vs. PCGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOIBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the PCGTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOIBX and PCGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HOIBX vs. PCGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOIBX drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, smaller than the maximum PCGTX drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOIBX and PCGTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOIBX	PCGTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.15%	-19.34%	+1.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.03%	-3.09%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.97%	-7.94%	+1.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.15%	-19.20%	+1.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-19.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.29%	-1.40%	-0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.89%	-1.85%	-4.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.12%	0.92%	+0.20%

Volatility

HOIBX vs. PCGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Homestead Intermediate Bond Fund (HOIBX) is 1.19%, while PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) has a volatility of 1.48%. This indicates that HOIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOIBX	PCGTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.19%	1.48%	-0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.03%	4.54%	-1.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.02%	5.63%	-1.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.93%	7.18%	-1.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.53%	5.40%	+0.13%

HOIBX vs. PCGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOIBX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than PCGTX's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOIBX vs. PCGTX - Dividend Comparison

HOIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than PCGTX's 4.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HOIBX Homestead Intermediate Bond Fund	3.69%	3.68%	3.68%	2.67%	2.15%	1.30%	3.02%	2.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments	4.48%	3.78%	5.36%	5.02%	3.67%	2.87%	3.23%	3.53%	3.34%	2.96%	2.71%	2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOIBX and PCGTX in my portfolio?

HOIBX and PCGTX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HOIBX or PCGTX?

PCGTX has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to HOIBX (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOIBX dropped -18.15% vs PCGTX's -19.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.