HOGS.L vs. SLVR.L
HOGS.L (WisdomTree Lean Hogs) and SLVR.L (WisdomTree Silver) are both exchange-traded funds - HOGS.L is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Lean Hogs, while SLVR.L is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HOGS.L returned -6.22%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for SLVR.L. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
HOGS.L vs. SLVR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOGS.L achieves a -7.82% return, which is significantly lower than SLVR.L's 3.62% return. Over the past 10 years, HOGS.L has underperformed SLVR.L with an annualized return of -6.22%, while SLVR.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.50% annualized return.
HOGS.L
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- -7.82%
- 6M
- -3.60%
- 1Y
- -6.57%
- 3Y*
- 9.10%
- 5Y*
- -2.16%
- 10Y*
- -6.22%
SLVR.L
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 3.62%
- 6M
- 28.48%
- 1Y
- 109.37%
- 3Y*
- 43.40%
- 5Y*
- 19.20%
- 10Y*
- 13.50%
HOGS.L vs. SLVR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOGS.L WisdomTree Lean Hogs | -7.82% | 6.22% | 22.20% | -22.50% | 9.28% | 31.95% | -34.91% | -21.42% | -9.85% | 3.39% |
SLVR.L WisdomTree Silver | 3.62% | 136.72% | 20.15% | -2.57% | 2.25% | -14.66% | 40.61% | 13.97% | -10.13% | 1.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOGS.L and SLVR.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2007 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOGS.L vs. SLVR.L — Risk / Return Rank
HOGS.L
SLVR.L
HOGS.L vs. SLVR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Lean Hogs (HOGS.L) and WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HOGS.L | SLVR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.33 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 2.67 | -3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | 5.81 | -6.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOGS.L | SLVR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 | 1.85 | -2.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.52 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.23 | 0.42 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.32 | 0.22 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
HOGS.L vs. SLVR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOGS.L drawdown since its inception was -93.79%, which is greater than SLVR.L's maximum drawdown of -79.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOGS.L and SLVR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOGS.L | SLVR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.79% | -79.93% | -13.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.24% | -40.74% | +24.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.71% | -40.74% | +21.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.15% | -40.74% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.76% | -46.90% | -26.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.83% | -35.42% | -52.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.70% | -49.43% | -25.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.02% | 18.74% | -10.72% |
Volatility
HOGS.L vs. SLVR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Lean Hogs (HOGS.L) is 5.17%, while WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L) has a volatility of 17.68%. This indicates that HOGS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOGS.L | SLVR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 17.68% | -12.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.71% | 56.07% | -43.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.58% | 58.81% | -40.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.97% | 36.80% | -4.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.40% | 31.95% | +6.45% |
HOGS.L vs. SLVR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HOGS.L and SLVR.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
HOGS.L vs. SLVR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither HOGS.L nor SLVR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HOGS.L and SLVR.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOGS.L and SLVR.L have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
HOGS.L is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while SLVR.L is Silver. HOGS.L tracks Bloomberg Lean Hogs, while SLVR.L tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex.
Find the right allocation for HOGS.L and SLVR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer