PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOCT vs. SFLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOCT vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HOCT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SFLR

1D
-0.38%
1M
5.11%
YTD
5.55%
6M
5.78%
1Y
19.44%
3Y*
16.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOCT vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOCT vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOCT

SFLR
SFLR Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOCT vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HOCT vs. SFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOCTSFLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.71

Drawdowns

HOCT vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOCT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum SFLR drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOCT and SFLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOCTSFLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-12.13%

+12.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.38%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-1.74%

+1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

Volatility

HOCT vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOCTSFLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

8.89%

-8.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

10.15%

-10.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

10.15%

-10.15%

HOCT vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOCT vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison

HOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HOCT
Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
0.32%0.33%0.42%1.16%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, HOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.

SFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for HOCT.

Their fees differ too: 0.79% for HOCT and 0.89% for SFLR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOCT and SFLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer