PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOCT vs. MSTQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOCT vs. MSTQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HOCT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTQ

1D
-0.21%
1M
9.02%
YTD
17.40%
6M
15.69%
1Y
31.81%
3Y*
24.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOCT vs. MSTQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOCT vs. MSTQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOCT

MSTQ
MSTQ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
MSTQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOCT vs. MSTQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HOCT vs. MSTQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOCTMSTQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

Drawdowns

HOCT vs. MSTQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOCT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum MSTQ drawdown of -31.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOCT and MSTQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOCTMSTQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-31.05%

+31.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.21%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-8.62%

+8.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.97%

Volatility

HOCT vs. MSTQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOCTMSTQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

14.35%

-14.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

18.85%

-18.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

18.85%

-18.85%

HOCT vs. MSTQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTQ's 1.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOCT vs. MSTQ - Dividend Comparison

HOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSTQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.90%.


PositionTTM202520242023
HOCT
Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSTQ
LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF
11.90%13.97%3.72%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, HOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.59% for MSTQ.

MSTQ has the higher dividend yield at 11.90%, compared with 0.00% for HOCT.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Little Harbor Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for HOCT and 1.59% for MSTQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOCT and MSTQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer