HOCT vs. MSTQ
HOCT (Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October) and MSTQ (LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. HOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.59%/yr for MSTQ.
Performance
HOCT vs. MSTQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HOCT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTQ
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 9.02%
- YTD
- 17.40%
- 6M
- 15.69%
- 1Y
- 31.81%
- 3Y*
- 24.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOCT vs. MSTQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% |
MSTQ LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF | 18.81% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOCT vs. MSTQ — Risk / Return Rank
HOCT
MSTQ
HOCT vs. MSTQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOCT | MSTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.87 | — |
Drawdowns
HOCT vs. MSTQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOCT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum MSTQ drawdown of -31.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOCT and MSTQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOCT | MSTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -31.05% | +31.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.21% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -8.62% | +8.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.97% | — |
Volatility
HOCT vs. MSTQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOCT | MSTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 14.35% | -14.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 18.85% | -18.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 18.85% | -18.85% |
HOCT vs. MSTQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTQ's 1.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOCT vs. MSTQ - Dividend Comparison
HOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSTQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSTQ LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF | 11.90% | 13.97% | 3.72% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, HOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.59% for MSTQ.
MSTQ has the higher dividend yield at 11.90%, compared with 0.00% for HOCT.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Little Harbor Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for HOCT and 1.59% for MSTQ.
Find the right allocation for HOCT and MSTQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer