HOCT vs. JULJ
HOCT (Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October) and JULJ (Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
HOCT vs. JULJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HOCT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULJ
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- 5.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOCT vs. JULJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% |
JULJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July | 1.43% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOCT vs. JULJ — Risk / Return Rank
HOCT
JULJ
HOCT vs. JULJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOCT | JULJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.96 | — |
Drawdowns
HOCT vs. JULJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOCT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum JULJ drawdown of -3.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOCT and JULJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOCT | JULJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -3.62% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.02% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.10% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.12% | — |
Volatility
HOCT vs. JULJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOCT | JULJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 1.54% | -1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 3.08% | -3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 3.08% | -3.08% |
HOCT vs. JULJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HOCT and JULJ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
HOCT vs. JULJ - Dividend Comparison
HOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JULJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JULJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July | 5.66% | 5.76% | 5.96% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOCT and JULJ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
JULJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 0.00% for HOCT.
Find the right allocation for HOCT and JULJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer