HOCT vs. IVVM
HOCT (Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October) and IVVM (iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. HOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IVVM.
Performance
HOCT vs. IVVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HOCT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVVM
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 5.95%
- 6M
- 6.15%
- 1Y
- 16.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOCT vs. IVVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% |
IVVM iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF | 4.98% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOCT vs. IVVM — Risk / Return Rank
HOCT
IVVM
HOCT vs. IVVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOCT | IVVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.49 | — |
Drawdowns
HOCT vs. IVVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOCT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum IVVM drawdown of -11.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOCT and IVVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOCT | IVVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -11.62% | +11.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.22% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.92% | +0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.06% | — |
Volatility
HOCT vs. IVVM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOCT | IVVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.76% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 7.04% | -7.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 9.62% | -9.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 9.62% | -9.62% |
HOCT vs. IVVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOCT vs. IVVM - Dividend Comparison
HOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVVM iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.65% | 0.68% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, IVVM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IVVM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for HOCT.
IVVM has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for HOCT.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for HOCT and 0.50% for IVVM.
Find the right allocation for HOCT and IVVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer