HOCT vs. IVVB
HOCT (Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October) and IVVB (iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. HOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IVVB.
Performance
HOCT vs. IVVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HOCT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVVB
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- YTD
- 4.57%
- 6M
- 4.37%
- 1Y
- 14.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOCT vs. IVVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% |
IVVB iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF | 3.17% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOCT vs. IVVB — Risk / Return Rank
HOCT
IVVB
HOCT vs. IVVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOCT | IVVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.31 | — |
Drawdowns
HOCT vs. IVVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOCT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum IVVB drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOCT and IVVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOCT | IVVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -13.08% | +13.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.15% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -1.61% | +1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.34% | — |
Volatility
HOCT vs. IVVB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOCT | IVVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 7.27% | -7.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 9.28% | -9.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 9.28% | -9.28% |
HOCT vs. IVVB - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVB's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOCT vs. IVVB - Dividend Comparison
HOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVVB iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF | 1.17% | 1.22% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, IVVB is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IVVB is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for HOCT.
IVVB has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.00% for HOCT.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for HOCT and 0.50% for IVVB.
Find the right allocation for HOCT and IVVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer