PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOCT vs. APRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOCT vs. APRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HOCT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APRW

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.28%
YTD
6.27%
6M
7.02%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
10.31%
5Y*
7.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOCT vs. APRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOCT vs. APRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOCT

APRW
APRW Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
APRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRW Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
APRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRW Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOCT vs. APRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HOCT vs. APRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOCTAPRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

Drawdowns

HOCT vs. APRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOCT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum APRW drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOCT and APRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOCTAPRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-9.61%

+9.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.09%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-1.12%

+1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.15%

Volatility

HOCT vs. APRW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOCTAPRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

2.62%

-2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

6.72%

-6.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

6.41%

-6.41%

HOCT vs. APRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than APRW's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOCT vs. APRW - Dividend Comparison

Neither HOCT nor APRW has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
APRW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.67%
HOCT
Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, APRW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

APRW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for HOCT.

HOCT and APRW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for HOCT and 0.74% for APRW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOCT and APRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer