PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOCT vs. APRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOCT vs. APRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HOCT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APRT

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.07%
YTD
9.89%
6M
10.85%
1Y
19.10%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOCT vs. APRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOCT vs. APRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOCT

APRT
APRT Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
APRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
APRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOCT vs. APRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HOCT vs. APRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOCTAPRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

Drawdowns

HOCT vs. APRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOCT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum APRT drawdown of -14.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOCT and APRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOCTAPRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-14.98%

+14.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.20%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-2.05%

+2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

Volatility

HOCT vs. APRT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOCTAPRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

5.02%

-5.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

10.78%

-10.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

10.29%

-10.29%

HOCT vs. APRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than APRT's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOCT vs. APRT - Dividend Comparison

Neither HOCT nor APRT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
APRT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.67%
HOCT
Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, APRT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

APRT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for HOCT.

HOCT and APRT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for HOCT and 0.74% for APRT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOCT and APRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer