PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HNGKY vs. CLLNY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HNGKY vs. CLLNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd ADR (HNGKY) and Cellnex Telecom S.A (CLLNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HNGKY achieves a 4.10% return, which is significantly higher than CLLNY's 0.25% return.


HNGKY

1D
-0.59%
1M
-11.24%
YTD
4.10%
6M
4.55%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
28.56%
5Y*
13.60%
10Y*
6.20%

CLLNY

1D
-1.71%
1M
-3.25%
YTD
0.25%
6M
2.16%
1Y
-16.35%
3Y*
-6.55%
5Y*
-13.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HNGKY vs. CLLNY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HNGKY
Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd ADR
4.10%68.39%28.96%-19.34%-1.94%26.39%-22.92%-14.75%
CLLNY
Cellnex Telecom S.A
0.25%2.87%-20.49%19.20%-42.80%-3.69%42.06%69.71%

Correlation

The correlation between HNGKY and CLLNY is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HNGKY:

$77.64B

CLLNY:

$43.31B

EPS

HNGKY:

-$0.06

CLLNY:

-€0.15

PS Ratio

HNGKY:

22.42

CLLNY:

7.44

PB Ratio

HNGKY:

2.52

CLLNY:

3.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

HNGKY:

$3.48B

CLLNY:

€4.50B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HNGKY:

$1.30B

CLLNY:

€2.28B

EBITDA (TTM)

HNGKY:

$2.19B

CLLNY:

€3.04B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd ADR

Cellnex Telecom S.A

Often compared with HNGKY:
HNGKY vs. UOLGY

Return for Risk

HNGKY vs. CLLNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HNGKY
HNGKY Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
HNGKY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HNGKY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HNGKY Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
HNGKY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
HNGKY Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

CLLNY
CLLNY Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CLLNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLLNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLLNY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CLLNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLLNY Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HNGKY vs. CLLNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd ADR (HNGKY) and Cellnex Telecom S.A (CLLNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HNGKYCLLNYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.92

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

-0.56

+1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.70

-0.93

+3.63

HNGKY vs. CLLNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HNGKY Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the CLLNY Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HNGKY and CLLNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HNGKY vs. CLLNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HNGKY drawdown since its inception was -52.89%, smaller than the maximum CLLNY drawdown of -64.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HNGKY and CLLNY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HNGKYCLLNYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.89%

-64.29%

+11.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.70%

-29.38%

+7.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.34%

-34.54%

+9.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.48%

-62.07%

+18.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.76%

-58.29%

+37.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.98%

-42.54%

+23.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.42%

17.68%

-9.26%

Volatility

HNGKY vs. CLLNY - Volatility Comparison

Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd ADR (HNGKY) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to Cellnex Telecom S.A (CLLNY) at 5.51%. This indicates that HNGKY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLLNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HNGKYCLLNYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.91%

5.51%

+1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.42%

21.47%

+3.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.05%

27.11%

+14.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.46%

31.77%

+6.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.01%

42.97%

-9.96%

Dividends

HNGKY vs. CLLNY - Dividend Comparison

HNGKY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, while CLLNY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CLLNY
Cellnex Telecom S.A
0.00%0.05%0.17%0.13%0.16%3.89%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HNGKY
Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd ADR
3.52%3.30%5.06%6.10%5.78%4.18%5.05%3.52%3.02%2.58%2.64%

Financials

HNGKY vs. CLLNY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hong Kong Land Holdings Ltd ADR and Cellnex Telecom S.A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B202120222023202420252026
722.50M
1.00B
(HNGKY) Total Revenue
(CLLNY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. HNGKY values in USD, CLLNY values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


HNGKY and CLLNY have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HNGKY has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to CLLNY (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HNGKY dropped -52.89% vs CLLNY's -64.29%.

HNGKY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HNGKY and CLLNY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer