HNDX.DE vs. FTGQ.DE
HNDX.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) and FTGQ.DE (First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. HNDX.DE is passively managed, while FTGQ.DE is actively managed. Over the past year, HNDX.DE returned 26.80% vs 17.27% for FTGQ.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HNDX.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for FTGQ.DE.
Performance
HNDX.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HNDX.DE achieves a 14.79% return, which is significantly higher than FTGQ.DE's 8.55% return.
HNDX.DE
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -3.09%
- 6M
- 16.12%
- YTD
- 14.79%
- 1Y
- 26.80%
- 3Y*
- 22.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.90%
- 10Y*
- 18.84%
FTGQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- YTD
- 8.55%
- 1Y
- 17.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HNDX.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HNDX.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 14.79% | 17.83% | -0.83% |
FTGQ.DE First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation | 8.55% | 1.05% | -3.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between HNDX.DE and FTGQ.DE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HNDX.DE vs. FTGQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
HNDX.DE
FTGQ.DE
HNDX.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (HNDX.DE) and First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HNDX.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.36 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 4.56 | -2.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.31 | 12.48 | -5.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HNDX.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HNDX.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.18%, which is greater than FTGQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HNDX.DE and FTGQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HNDX.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.18% | -19.13% | -18.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.13% | -3.80% | -8.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.40% | -1.05% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -5.58% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.65% | 1.39% | +2.26% |
Volatility
HNDX.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (HNDX.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.86% compared to First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE) at 2.15%. This indicates that HNDX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTGQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HNDX.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.86% | 2.15% | +6.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.67% | 5.40% | +10.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.00% | 8.80% | +10.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 12.48% | +8.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 12.48% | +7.73% |
HNDX.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
HNDX.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGQ.DE's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
HNDX.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither HNDX.DE nor FTGQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HNDX.DE and FTGQ.DE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HNDX.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HNDX.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FTGQ.DE.
They also come from different issuers: Amundi and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HNDX.DE and 0.90% for FTGQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for HNDX.DE and FTGQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer