PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HNDRX vs. GTSOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HNDRX vs. GTSOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Defined Risk Fund (HNDRX) and Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio (GTSOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HNDRX achieves a 4.83% return, which is significantly lower than GTSOX's 5.77% return.


HNDRX

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.34%
YTD
4.83%
6M
5.02%
1Y
13.32%
3Y*
12.91%
5Y*
8.59%
10Y*

GTSOX

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.26%
YTD
5.77%
6M
6.00%
1Y
15.09%
3Y*
10.51%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*
7.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HNDRX vs. GTSOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HNDRX
Horizon Defined Risk Fund
4.83%10.78%15.41%14.97%-10.12%13.08%7.21%13.22%-1.67%
GTSOX
Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio
5.77%7.73%13.79%14.59%-11.69%18.06%4.22%18.45%-5.63%

Correlation

The correlation between HNDRX and GTSOX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2018

0.84

The correlation between HNDRX and GTSOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HNDRX vs. GTSOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HNDRX
HNDRX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
HNDRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HNDRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HNDRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
HNDRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
HNDRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

GTSOX
GTSOX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GTSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
GTSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HNDRX vs. GTSOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Defined Risk Fund (HNDRX) and Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio (GTSOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HNDRXGTSOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.82

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

3.03

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.17

20.73

-6.56

HNDRX vs. GTSOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HNDRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the GTSOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HNDRX and GTSOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HNDRXGTSOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.75

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.55

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.59

+0.18

Drawdowns

HNDRX vs. GTSOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HNDRX drawdown since its inception was -20.71%, smaller than the maximum GTSOX drawdown of -29.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HNDRX and GTSOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HNDRXGTSOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.71%

-29.21%

+8.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.48%

-5.05%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.42%

-22.03%

+10.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.99%

-22.03%

+8.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.14%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.79%

-2.97%

+0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.73%

+0.21%

Volatility

HNDRX vs. GTSOX - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Defined Risk Fund (HNDRX) has a higher volatility of 0.76% compared to Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio (GTSOX) at 0.59%. This indicates that HNDRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTSOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HNDRXGTSOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

0.59%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.64%

5.07%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.93%

5.56%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.32%

13.18%

-3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.48%

13.44%

-2.96%

HNDRX vs. GTSOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HNDRX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than GTSOX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

HNDRX vs. GTSOX - Dividend Comparison

HNDRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than GTSOX's 6.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTSOX
Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio
6.90%7.47%12.31%0.00%0.00%13.35%0.00%7.56%2.62%6.57%5.01%5.95%
HNDRX
Horizon Defined Risk Fund
0.20%0.21%0.09%0.21%0.36%0.28%0.57%0.55%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HNDRX and GTSOX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HNDRX has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to GTSOX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HNDRX dropped -20.71% vs GTSOX's -29.21%.

GTSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HNDRX and GTSOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer