HMXJ.L vs. XMTW.L
HMXJ.L (HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF) and XMTW.L (Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - HMXJ.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD while XMTW.L tracks the MSCI Taiwan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HMXJ.L returned 8.13%/yr vs 22.64%/yr for XMTW.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HMXJ.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for XMTW.L.
Performance
HMXJ.L vs. XMTW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMXJ.L achieves a 8.31% return, which is significantly lower than XMTW.L's 68.87% return. Over the past 10 years, HMXJ.L has underperformed XMTW.L with an annualized return of 8.13%, while XMTW.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.64% annualized return.
HMXJ.L
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 8.31%
- 6M
- 8.22%
- 1Y
- 16.45%
- 3Y*
- 11.53%
- 5Y*
- 5.95%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
XMTW.L
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 68.87%
- 6M
- 72.82%
- 1Y
- 106.56%
- 3Y*
- 41.89%
- 5Y*
- 22.98%
- 10Y*
- 22.64%
HMXJ.L vs. XMTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMXJ.L HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF | 8.31% | 12.37% | 6.43% | 0.38% | 5.35% | 5.41% | 3.21% | 13.92% | -5.45% | 14.45% |
XMTW.L Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C | 68.87% | 23.98% | 25.99% | 21.66% | -21.11% | 28.96% | 32.40% | 29.87% | -3.20% | 16.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMXJ.L and XMTW.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2010 | 0.64 |
The correlation between HMXJ.L and XMTW.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HMXJ.L vs. XMTW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HMXJ.L
XMTW.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
HMXJ.L
XMTW.L
Basic Materials
HMXJ.L
XMTW.L
Industrials
HMXJ.L
XMTW.L
Real Estate
HMXJ.L
XMTW.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
HMXJ.L
XMTW.L
Utilities
HMXJ.L
XMTW.L
-
Healthcare
HMXJ.L
XMTW.L
Consumer Defensive
HMXJ.L
XMTW.L
Energy
HMXJ.L
XMTW.L
-
Communication Services
HMXJ.L
XMTW.L
Technology
HMXJ.L
XMTW.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMXJ.L vs. XMTW.L — Risk / Return Rank
HMXJ.L
XMTW.L
HMXJ.L vs. XMTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (XMTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HMXJ.L | XMTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.71 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 11.70 | -9.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.50 | 30.79 | -24.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HMXJ.L vs. XMTW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -32.30%, smaller than the maximum XMTW.L drawdown of -99.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMXJ.L and XMTW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMXJ.L | XMTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.30% | -99.22% | +66.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.12% | -9.05% | +1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.47% | -28.76% | +11.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.65% | -30.18% | +12.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.30% | -30.18% | -2.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -6.28% | +2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -22.20% | +15.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 3.45% | -0.93% |
Volatility
HMXJ.L vs. XMTW.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L) is 3.94%, while Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (XMTW.L) has a volatility of 10.56%. This indicates that HMXJ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMTW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMXJ.L | XMTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 10.56% | -6.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.79% | 20.21% | -11.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.24% | 24.17% | -12.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 24.89% | -11.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 22.35% | -6.63% |
HMXJ.L vs. XMTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMXJ.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than XMTW.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMXJ.L vs. XMTW.L - Dividend Comparison
HMXJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, while XMTW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMXJ.L HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF | 3.04% | 3.43% | 3.80% | 4.13% | 3.79% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 3.88% | 3.80% | 3.23% | 3.32% | 4.03% |
XMTW.L Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMXJ.L and XMTW.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HMXJ.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMXJ.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XMTW.L.
HMXJ.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while XMTW.L tracks MSCI Taiwan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HMXJ.L and 0.65% for XMTW.L.
Find the right allocation for HMXJ.L and XMTW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer