HMXJ.L vs. FRQX.L
HMXJ.L (HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF) and FRQX.L (Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - HMXJ.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD while FRQX.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HMXJ.L returned 6.07%/yr vs 14.74%/yr for FRQX.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
HMXJ.L vs. FRQX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HMXJ.L is traded in GBp, while FRQX.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FRQX.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMXJ.L achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than FRQX.L's 43.69% return.
HMXJ.L
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- 1Y
- 17.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.62%
- 5Y*
- 6.07%
- 10Y*
- 8.45%
FRQX.L
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- 10.47%
- YTD
- 43.69%
- 6M
- 48.15%
- 1Y
- 78.41%
- 3Y*
- 26.02%
- 5Y*
- 14.74%
- 10Y*
- —
HMXJ.L vs. FRQX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMXJ.L HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF | 8.91% | 12.37% | 6.43% | 0.38% | 5.35% | 5.41% | 3.21% | 13.89% | -5.49% |
FRQX.L Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF | 43.69% | 21.13% | 9.39% | 5.79% | -2.53% | 5.94% | 3.15% | 6.30% | -4.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMXJ.L and FRQX.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HMXJ.L and FRQX.L has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HMXJ.L vs. FRQX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HMXJ.L
FRQX.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
HMXJ.L
FRQX.L
Basic Materials
HMXJ.L
FRQX.L
Industrials
HMXJ.L
FRQX.L
Real Estate
HMXJ.L
FRQX.L
Consumer Cyclical
HMXJ.L
FRQX.L
Utilities
HMXJ.L
FRQX.L
Healthcare
HMXJ.L
FRQX.L
Consumer Defensive
HMXJ.L
FRQX.L
Energy
HMXJ.L
FRQX.L
Communication Services
HMXJ.L
FRQX.L
Technology
HMXJ.L
FRQX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMXJ.L vs. FRQX.L — Risk / Return Rank
HMXJ.L
FRQX.L
HMXJ.L vs. FRQX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L) and Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMXJ.L | FRQX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.71 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 5.97 | -3.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | 23.58 | -16.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMXJ.L | FRQX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 4.05 | -2.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 1.00 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.65 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
HMXJ.L vs. FRQX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -32.30%, which is greater than FRQX.L's maximum drawdown of -20.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMXJ.L and FRQX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMXJ.L | FRQX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.30% | -20.77% | -11.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.12% | -13.07% | +5.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.47% | -19.42% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.65% | -19.42% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | -2.56% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.74% | -3.94% | -2.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 3.31% | -0.93% |
Volatility
HMXJ.L vs. FRQX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L) is 3.58%, while Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that HMXJ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRQX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMXJ.L | FRQX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 7.40% | -3.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.32% | 16.78% | -8.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.89% | 19.27% | -8.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.80% | 14.77% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 16.44% | -0.32% |
HMXJ.L vs. FRQX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HMXJ.L and FRQX.L have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
HMXJ.L vs. FRQX.L - Dividend Comparison
HMXJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, while FRQX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRQX.L Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HMXJ.L HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF | 3.02% | 3.43% | 3.80% | 4.13% | 3.79% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 3.88% | 3.80% | 3.23% | 3.32% | 4.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMXJ.L and FRQX.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMXJ.L and FRQX.L have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
HMXJ.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while FRQX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Franklin Templeton.
Find the right allocation for HMXJ.L and FRQX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer