PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HMWO.L vs. XDEB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HMWO.L vs. XDEB.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HMWO.L (HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF) and XDEB.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from HSBC and DWS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HMWO.L returned 12.15%/yr vs 7.93%/yr for XDEB.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HMWO.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEB.L.

Performance

HMWO.L vs. XDEB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWO.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMWO.L achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly higher than XDEB.L's 1.04% return. Over the past 10 years, HMWO.L has outperformed XDEB.L with an annualized return of 12.15%, while XDEB.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.

HMWO.L

1D
0.16%
1M
5.13%
YTD
9.53%
6M
9.79%
1Y
25.75%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
12.15%

XDEB.L

1D
0.15%
1M
1.82%
YTD
1.04%
6M
0.90%
1Y
2.65%
3Y*
6.61%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
7.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMWO.L vs. XDEB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HMWO.L
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF		9.53%11.10%19.31%15.79%-10.00%22.25%10.57%20.88%-5.47%9.85%
XDEB.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C		1.04%3.40%13.01%1.49%1.23%16.00%-0.96%18.55%3.44%7.02%

Correlation

The correlation between HMWO.L and XDEB.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2014

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between HMWO.L and XDEB.L has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HMWO.L vs. XDEB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HMWO.L
XDEB.L

Technology

30.2%
20.1%

Financial Services

15.4%
14.0%

Industrials

11.0%
9.2%

Communication Services

9.1%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
5.6%

Healthcare

8.6%
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
10.9%

Energy

4.1%
4.5%

Basic Materials

3.2%
1.1%

Utilities

2.5%
8.1%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.7%

Technology

HMWO.L
30.2%
XDEB.L
20.1%

Financial Services

HMWO.L
15.4%
XDEB.L
14.0%

Industrials

HMWO.L
11.0%
XDEB.L
9.2%

Communication Services

HMWO.L
9.1%
XDEB.L
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HMWO.L
9.0%
XDEB.L
5.6%

Healthcare

HMWO.L
8.6%
XDEB.L
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

HMWO.L
5.2%
XDEB.L
10.9%

Energy

HMWO.L
4.1%
XDEB.L
4.5%

Basic Materials

HMWO.L
3.2%
XDEB.L
1.1%

Utilities

HMWO.L
2.5%
XDEB.L
8.1%

Real Estate

HMWO.L
1.8%
XDEB.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF

Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C

Often compared with HMWO.L:
HMWO.L vs. VWRL.LHMWO.L vs. VWRP.LHMWO.L vs. VEVE.LHMWO.L vs. IWRD.LHMWO.L vs. SWDA.LHMWO.L vs. FWRGHMWO.L vs. GGRP.L
Often compared with XDEB.L:
XDEB.L vs. MVUS.LXDEB.L vs. XDEM.LXDEB.L vs. SWDA.LXDEB.L vs. XDEQ.LXDEB.L vs. VWRA.LXDEB.L vs. VHYL.ASXDEB.L vs. ISWD.L

Return for Risk

HMWO.L vs. XDEB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HMWO.L
HMWO.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
HMWO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMWO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMWO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
HMWO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMWO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
XDEB.L
XDEB.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMWO.L vs. XDEB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWO.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HMWO.LXDEB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.50
0.33

+2.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.44
0.54

+2.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.06

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

0.41

+3.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.06

1.14

+13.92

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HMWO.L vs. XDEB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMWO.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMWO.L and XDEB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HMWO.LXDEB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

0.33

+2.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.66

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.69

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.78

-0.06

Drawdowns

HMWO.L vs. XDEB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMWO.L drawdown since its inception was -25.48%, which is greater than XDEB.L's maximum drawdown of -19.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMWO.L and XDEB.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HMWO.LXDEB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.48%

-19.61%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.71%

-6.39%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

-8.47%

-10.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.01%

-10.19%

-8.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.48%

-19.61%

-5.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-3.52%

+3.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-3.50%

-0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

2.32%

-0.61%

Volatility

HMWO.L vs. XDEB.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWO.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) have volatilities of 2.54% and 2.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HMWO.LXDEB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

2.66%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.34%

5.97%

+1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.26%

7.97%

+2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.28%

9.68%

+3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.47%

11.52%

+2.95%

HMWO.L vs. XDEB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMWO.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEB.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HMWO.L vs. XDEB.L - Dividend Comparison

HMWO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while XDEB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMWO.L
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF		0.01%0.01%0.01%0.02%0.02%0.01%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%
XDEB.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

HMWO.L and XDEB.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HMWO.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HMWO.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEB.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for HMWO.L and 0.25% for XDEB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMWO.L and XDEB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer