HMWO.L vs. MWOZ.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HMWO.L (HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF) and MWOZ.L (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist) are both Global Equities funds - HMWO.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while MWOZ.L tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HMWO.L returned 25.75% vs 27.68% for MWOZ.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HMWO.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MWOZ.L.

Performance

HMWO.L vs. MWOZ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWO.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HMWO.L is traded in GBp, while MWOZ.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MWOZ.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMWO.L achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than MWOZ.L's 10.17% return.

HMWO.L

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 5.13%
• YTD: 9.53%
• 6M: 9.79%
• 1Y: 25.75%
• 3Y*: 16.04%
• 5Y*: 11.42%
• 10Y*: 12.15%

MWOZ.L

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 5.09%
• YTD: 10.17%
• 6M: 10.38%
• 1Y: 27.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMWO.L vs. MWOZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HMWO.L HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF	9.53%	6.84%
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist	10.17%	8.44%

Correlation

The correlation between HMWO.L and MWOZ.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025	0.97

The correlation between HMWO.L and MWOZ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HMWO.L vs. MWOZ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMWO.L

HMWO.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
HMWO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
HMWO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
HMWO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 80
HMWO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
HMWO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 78

MWOZ.L

MWOZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 83
MWOZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
MWOZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
MWOZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
MWOZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
MWOZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMWO.L vs. MWOZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWO.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HMWO.L	MWOZ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	2.68	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	3.68	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.51	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.82	4.16	-0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.06	16.80	-1.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HMWO.L vs. MWOZ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMWO.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the MWOZ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMWO.L and MWOZ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HMWO.L	MWOZ.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50	2.68	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	1.04	-0.32

Drawdowns

HMWO.L vs. MWOZ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMWO.L drawdown since its inception was -25.48%, which is greater than MWOZ.L's maximum drawdown of -18.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMWO.L and MWOZ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HMWO.L	MWOZ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.48%	-18.50%	-6.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.71%	-6.63%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-0.15%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.07%	-3.16%	-0.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	1.64%	+0.07%

Volatility

HMWO.L vs. MWOZ.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWO.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) have volatilities of 2.54% and 2.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HMWO.L	MWOZ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.54%	2.54%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.34%	7.27%	+0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.26%	10.29%	-0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.28%	13.91%	-0.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.47%	13.91%	+0.56%

HMWO.L vs. MWOZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMWO.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than MWOZ.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HMWO.L vs. MWOZ.L - Dividend Comparison

HMWO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than MWOZ.L's 1.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HMWO.L HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.02%	0.02%	0.01%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist	1.20%	1.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HMWO.L and MWOZ.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, HMWO.L and MWOZ.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, HMWO.L or MWOZ.L?

On fees, MWOZ.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HMWO.L or MWOZ.L?

MWOZ.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for HMWO.L.

What is the main difference between HMWO.L and MWOZ.L?

HMWO.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while MWOZ.L tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for HMWO.L and 0.05% for MWOZ.L.