PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HMWD.L vs. FLES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HMWD.L vs. FLES.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

HMWD.L (HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF) and FLES.L (Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - HMWD.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while FLES.L tracks the Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HMWD.L returned 11.71%/yr vs 1.62%/yr for FLES.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HMWD.L vs. FLES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWD.L) and Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF (FLES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HMWD.L is traded in USD, while FLES.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FLES.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMWD.L achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly higher than FLES.L's -1.49% return.

HMWD.L

1D
0.10%
1M
0.20%
6M
9.06%
YTD
10.23%
1Y
22.04%
3Y*
18.94%
5Y*
11.71%
10Y*
13.16%

FLES.L

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.93%
6M
-0.68%
YTD
-1.49%
1Y
0.66%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
1.62%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMWD.L vs. FLES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HMWD.L
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF		10.23%21.06%19.12%24.61%-18.25%22.44%16.43%27.45%-8.70%
FLES.L
Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF		-1.49%16.13%-2.23%6.56%-5.88%-6.70%8.72%-1.43%-1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between HMWD.L and FLES.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF

Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF

Often compared with HMWD.L:
HMWD.L vs. VWRL.ASHMWD.L vs. IWDA.LHMWD.L vs. VDIV.DEHMWD.L vs. TRET.ASHMWD.L vs. VWCE.DEHMWD.L vs. VWRL.LHMWD.L vs. VOO

Return for Risk

HMWD.L vs. FLES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HMWD.L
HMWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HMWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
HMWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
FLES.L
FLES.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FLES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FLES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMWD.L vs. FLES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWD.L) and Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF (FLES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

HMWD.LFLES.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.79
0.11

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.72
0.20

+2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.02

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

0.13

+2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.84

0.28

+10.56

HMWD.L vs. FLES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the FLES.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMWD.L and FLES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HMWD.L vs. FLES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMWD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, which is greater than FLES.L's maximum drawdown of -22.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMWD.L and FLES.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HMWD.LFLES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.01%

-22.21%

-11.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-5.08%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.58%

-7.56%

-10.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.99%

-19.33%

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.01%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-3.98%

+3.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-6.60%

+1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

2.39%

-0.36%

Volatility

HMWD.L vs. FLES.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWD.L) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF (FLES.L) at 1.61%. This indicates that HMWD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HMWD.LFLES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

1.61%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

4.56%

+5.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

6.22%

+6.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.63%

7.64%

+7.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.73%

7.25%

+8.48%

Dividends

HMWD.L vs. FLES.L - Dividend Comparison

HMWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than FLES.L's 1.92% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLES.L
Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF		1.92%2.62%2.55%1.20%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HMWD.L
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF		1.17%1.24%1.43%1.57%1.79%1.31%1.44%1.91%2.23%1.81%2.00%1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

HMWD.L and FLES.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HMWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while FLES.L tracks Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Franklin.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMWD.L and FLES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer