PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMUS.L vs. UDVD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMUS.L vs. UDVD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUS.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HMUS.L is traded in GBp, while UDVD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UDVD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMUS.L achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly higher than UDVD.L's 7.43% return. Over the past 10 years, HMUS.L has outperformed UDVD.L with an annualized return of 14.14%, while UDVD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.63% annualized return.


HMUS.L

1D
0.81%
1M
5.82%
YTD
8.53%
6M
8.62%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
16.28%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*
14.14%

UDVD.L

1D
0.11%
1M
1.72%
YTD
7.43%
6M
7.06%
1Y
13.99%
3Y*
6.98%
5Y*
6.80%
10Y*
9.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMUS.L vs. UDVD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HMUS.L
HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF
8.53%5.24%25.87%19.21%-11.56%27.15%15.77%24.66%-1.56%9.13%
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
7.43%0.84%9.52%-3.04%11.52%26.22%-2.19%18.00%1.76%5.70%

Correlation

The correlation between HMUS.L and UDVD.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2011

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between HMUS.L and UDVD.L has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HMUS.L vs. UDVD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HMUS.L
UDVD.L

Technology

38.7%
8.9%

Financial Services

11.2%
11.5%

Communication Services

10.6%
3.5%

Healthcare

9.3%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
5.2%

Industrials

7.7%
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
17.0%

Energy

3.8%
4.5%

Real Estate

1.8%
4.6%

Utilities

1.7%
14.8%

Basic Materials

1.6%
6.4%

Technology

HMUS.L
38.7%
UDVD.L
8.9%

Financial Services

HMUS.L
11.2%
UDVD.L
11.5%

Communication Services

HMUS.L
10.6%
UDVD.L
3.5%

Healthcare

HMUS.L
9.3%
UDVD.L
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

HMUS.L
9.0%
UDVD.L
5.2%

Industrials

HMUS.L
7.7%
UDVD.L
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

HMUS.L
4.7%
UDVD.L
17.0%

Energy

HMUS.L
3.8%
UDVD.L
4.5%

Real Estate

HMUS.L
1.8%
UDVD.L
4.6%

Utilities

HMUS.L
1.7%
UDVD.L
14.8%

Basic Materials

HMUS.L
1.6%
UDVD.L
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMUS.L vs. UDVD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMUS.L
HMUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HMUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
HMUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

UDVD.L
UDVD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMUS.L vs. UDVD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUS.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HMUS.LUDVD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.22

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

2.15

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.82

5.62

+7.20

HMUS.L vs. UDVD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMUS.L and UDVD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HMUS.LUDVD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

1.29

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.49

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

0.60

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.77

+0.15

Drawdowns

HMUS.L vs. UDVD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMUS.L drawdown since its inception was -25.78%, smaller than the maximum UDVD.L drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMUS.L and UDVD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMUS.LUDVD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.78%

-28.19%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.80%

-6.47%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.87%

-16.57%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.87%

-16.57%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.78%

-28.19%

+2.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.26%

+3.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.65%

-4.22%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

2.48%

-0.66%

Volatility

HMUS.L vs. UDVD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUS.L) is 2.54%, while SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L) has a volatility of 3.00%. This indicates that HMUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UDVD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMUS.LUDVD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

3.00%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.37%

8.23%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.65%

10.81%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.17%

13.76%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.78%

16.06%

+0.72%

HMUS.L vs. UDVD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMUS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than UDVD.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

HMUS.L vs. UDVD.L - Dividend Comparison

HMUS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than UDVD.L's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMUS.L
HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF
0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.05%2.17%2.03%2.24%2.13%2.15%2.36%2.01%2.27%1.78%1.83%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


HMUS.L and UDVD.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HMUS.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HMUS.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UDVD.L.

HMUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while UDVD.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HMUS.L and 0.35% for UDVD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMUS.L and UDVD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer