HMUS.L vs. H50E.L
HMUS.L (HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF) and H50E.L (HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HMUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while H50E.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HMUS.L returned 14.14%/yr vs 11.61%/yr for H50E.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HMUS.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for H50E.L.
Performance
HMUS.L vs. H50E.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMUS.L achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly higher than H50E.L's 6.58% return. Over the past 10 years, HMUS.L has outperformed H50E.L with an annualized return of 14.14%, while H50E.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.61% annualized return.
HMUS.L
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 5.82%
- YTD
- 8.53%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- 1Y
- 22.08%
- 3Y*
- 16.28%
- 5Y*
- 12.41%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
H50E.L
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 5.00%
- YTD
- 6.58%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- 18.97%
- 3Y*
- 15.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
HMUS.L vs. H50E.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMUS.L HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 8.53% | 5.24% | 25.87% | 19.21% | -11.56% | 27.15% | 15.77% | 24.66% | -1.56% | 9.13% |
H50E.L HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF | 6.58% | 28.02% | 6.20% | 20.06% | -3.33% | 15.58% | 3.30% | 21.72% | -10.53% | 14.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMUS.L and H50E.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2010 | 0.60 |
The correlation between HMUS.L and H50E.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HMUS.L vs. H50E.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HMUS.L
H50E.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
HMUS.L
H50E.L
Financial Services
HMUS.L
H50E.L
Communication Services
HMUS.L
H50E.L
Healthcare
HMUS.L
H50E.L
Consumer Cyclical
HMUS.L
H50E.L
Industrials
HMUS.L
H50E.L
Consumer Defensive
HMUS.L
H50E.L
Energy
HMUS.L
H50E.L
Real Estate
HMUS.L
H50E.L
-
Utilities
HMUS.L
H50E.L
Basic Materials
HMUS.L
H50E.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMUS.L vs. H50E.L — Risk / Return Rank
HMUS.L
H50E.L
HMUS.L vs. H50E.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUS.L) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (H50E.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMUS.L | H50E.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.23 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 1.64 | +1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.82 | 5.52 | +7.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMUS.L | H50E.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 1.25 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.68 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 | 0.65 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.39 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
HMUS.L vs. H50E.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMUS.L drawdown since its inception was -25.78%, smaller than the maximum H50E.L drawdown of -34.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMUS.L and H50E.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMUS.L | H50E.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.78% | -34.68% | +8.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.80% | -11.49% | +4.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.87% | -14.20% | -7.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.87% | -21.72% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.78% | -31.50% | +5.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.42% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.65% | -7.22% | +3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 3.43% | -1.61% |
Volatility
HMUS.L vs. H50E.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUS.L) is 2.54%, while HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (H50E.L) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that HMUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H50E.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMUS.L | H50E.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.54% | 4.79% | -2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.37% | 12.32% | -4.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.65% | 15.11% | -4.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 17.19% | -2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 17.99% | -1.21% |
HMUS.L vs. H50E.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMUS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than H50E.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMUS.L vs. H50E.L - Dividend Comparison
HMUS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than H50E.L's 2.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H50E.L HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF | 2.45% | 2.46% | 2.98% | 2.92% | 2.77% | 2.01% | 2.05% | 3.04% | 3.50% | 2.76% | 2.79% | 2.63% |
HMUS.L HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMUS.L and H50E.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, H50E.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
H50E.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HMUS.L.
HMUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while H50E.L is Europe Equities. HMUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while H50E.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HMUS.L and 0.25% for H50E.L.
Find the right allocation for HMUS.L and H50E.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer