PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMUD.L vs. MVEA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMUD.L vs. MVEA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (MVEA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HMUD.L is traded in USD, while MVEA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MVEA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMUD.L achieves a 8.09% return, which is significantly higher than MVEA.L's 1.46% return.


HMUD.L

1D
0.04%
1M
3.54%
YTD
8.09%
6M
9.05%
1Y
22.04%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
14.60%

MVEA.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.87%
YTD
1.46%
6M
2.06%
1Y
3.10%
3Y*
9.82%
5Y*
5.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMUD.L vs. MVEA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HMUD.L
HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF
8.09%13.89%25.06%27.46%-20.22%27.36%18.59%
MVEA.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF
1.46%4.62%13.03%11.96%-11.86%24.60%9.51%

Correlation

The correlation between HMUD.L and MVEA.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2020

0.72

The correlation between HMUD.L and MVEA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMUD.L vs. MVEA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMUD.L
HMUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
HMUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

MVEA.L
MVEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MVEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MVEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMUD.L vs. MVEA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (MVEA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HMUD.LMVEA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.07

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

0.47

+2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.71

1.46

+10.25

HMUD.L vs. MVEA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMUD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the MVEA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMUD.L and MVEA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HMUD.LMVEA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

0.38

+1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.47

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.68

+0.21

Drawdowns

HMUD.L vs. MVEA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMUD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.30%, which is greater than MVEA.L's maximum drawdown of -20.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMUD.L and MVEA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMUD.LMVEA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.30%

-20.92%

-13.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-6.53%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.47%

-13.07%

-6.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.47%

-20.92%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-1.09%

+0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-4.96%

+0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.12%

-0.24%

Volatility

HMUD.L vs. MVEA.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (MVEA.L) at 2.10%. This indicates that HMUD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVEA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMUD.LMVEA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

2.10%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.21%

5.70%

+2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.23%

8.24%

+2.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

12.41%

+3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.36%

12.64%

+3.72%

HMUD.L vs. MVEA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMUD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MVEA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

HMUD.L vs. MVEA.L - Dividend Comparison

HMUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while MVEA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMUD.L
HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF
0.92%0.95%0.82%0.97%1.07%0.78%1.11%1.22%1.45%1.24%1.43%1.43%
MVEA.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HMUD.L and MVEA.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MVEA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MVEA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HMUD.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HMUD.L and 0.20% for MVEA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMUD.L and MVEA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer