PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMUD.L vs. LCUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMUD.L vs. LCUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) and Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF (LCUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HMUD.L is traded in USD, while LCUS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the LCUS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


HMUD.L

1D
0.04%
1M
3.54%
YTD
8.09%
6M
9.05%
1Y
22.04%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
14.60%

LCUS.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMUD.L vs. LCUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HMUD.L
HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF
8.09%13.89%25.06%27.46%-20.22%27.36%20.72%30.48%-5.60%
LCUS.L
Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF
0.00%5.91%25.25%26.69%-21.44%26.21%17.83%29.68%-7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between HMUD.L and LCUS.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018

0.84

The correlation between HMUD.L and LCUS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (3 years) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMUD.L vs. LCUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMUD.L
HMUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
HMUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUS.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMUD.L vs. LCUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) and Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF (LCUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HMUD.LLCUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.71

HMUD.L vs. LCUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HMUD.LLCUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

Drawdowns

HMUD.L vs. LCUS.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMUD.LLCUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

Volatility

HMUD.L vs. LCUS.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMUD.LLCUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.36%

HMUD.L vs. LCUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMUD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUS.L's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

HMUD.L vs. LCUS.L - Dividend Comparison

HMUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while LCUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMUD.L
HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF
0.92%0.95%0.82%0.97%1.07%0.78%1.11%1.22%1.45%1.24%1.43%1.43%
LCUS.L
Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.83%0.77%0.69%0.48%0.02%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HMUD.L and LCUS.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUS.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUS.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HMUD.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HMUD.L and 0.04% for LCUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMUD.L and LCUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer