PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMUD.L vs. ISDU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMUD.L vs. ISDU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) and iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMUD.L achieves a 8.09% return, which is significantly lower than ISDU.L's 23.62% return. Over the past 10 years, HMUD.L has outperformed ISDU.L with an annualized return of 14.60%, while ISDU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.60% annualized return.


HMUD.L

1D
0.04%
1M
3.54%
YTD
8.09%
6M
9.05%
1Y
22.04%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
14.60%

ISDU.L

1D
0.83%
1M
13.22%
YTD
23.62%
6M
24.88%
1Y
42.22%
3Y*
20.40%
5Y*
14.50%
10Y*
12.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMUD.L vs. ISDU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HMUD.L
HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF
8.09%13.89%25.06%27.46%-20.22%27.36%20.72%30.48%-5.72%21.56%
ISDU.L
iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF
23.62%16.32%9.36%25.84%-11.90%29.59%6.85%20.62%-6.04%14.03%

Correlation

The correlation between HMUD.L and ISDU.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2010

0.83

The correlation between HMUD.L and ISDU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.91 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMUD.L vs. ISDU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMUD.L
HMUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
HMUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

ISDU.L
ISDU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ISDU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISDU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISDU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ISDU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISDU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMUD.L vs. ISDU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) and iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HMUD.LISDU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.56

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

6.09

-3.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.71

20.40

-8.69

HMUD.L vs. ISDU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMUD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is lower than the ISDU.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMUD.L and ISDU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HMUD.LISDU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

3.24

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.90

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.78

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.66

+0.23

Drawdowns

HMUD.L vs. ISDU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMUD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.30%, smaller than the maximum ISDU.L drawdown of -37.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMUD.L and ISDU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMUD.LISDU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.30%

-37.79%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-6.90%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.47%

-21.98%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.47%

-21.98%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.30%

-33.01%

-1.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

0.00%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-4.20%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.06%

-0.18%

Volatility

HMUD.L vs. ISDU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) is 2.80%, while iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L) has a volatility of 5.02%. This indicates that HMUD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISDU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMUD.LISDU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

5.02%

-2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.21%

9.93%

-1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.23%

13.05%

-1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

16.17%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.36%

16.18%

+0.18%

HMUD.L vs. ISDU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HMUD.L and ISDU.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Dividends

HMUD.L vs. ISDU.L - Dividend Comparison

HMUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than ISDU.L's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMUD.L
HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF
0.92%0.95%0.82%0.97%1.07%0.78%1.11%1.22%1.45%1.24%1.43%1.43%
ISDU.L
iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF
0.61%0.74%0.90%1.10%1.52%1.01%1.39%1.37%1.49%1.38%1.34%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


HMUD.L and ISDU.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HMUD.L and ISDU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

HMUD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while ISDU.L tracks MSCI USA Islamic Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMUD.L and ISDU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer