HMUD.L vs. HPRO.L
HMUD.L (HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF) and HPRO.L (HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HMUD.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while HPRO.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HMUD.L returned 14.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HPRO.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HMUD.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for HPRO.L.
Performance
HMUD.L vs. HPRO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HMUD.L is traded in USD, while HPRO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HPRO.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMUD.L achieves a 8.09% return, which is significantly higher than HPRO.L's 4.79% return. Over the past 10 years, HMUD.L has outperformed HPRO.L with an annualized return of 14.60%, while HPRO.L has yielded a comparatively lower 0.35% annualized return.
HMUD.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 8.09%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- 1Y
- 22.04%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
HPRO.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- 4.79%
- 6M
- 5.44%
- 1Y
- 8.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.66%
- 5Y*
- -1.99%
- 10Y*
- 0.35%
HMUD.L vs. HPRO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMUD.L HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 8.09% | 13.89% | 25.06% | 27.46% | -20.22% | 27.36% | 20.72% | 30.48% | -5.72% | 21.56% |
HPRO.L HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF | 4.79% | 7.92% | -3.57% | 6.44% | -27.04% | 23.57% | -11.41% | 17.75% | -8.89% | 8.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMUD.L and HPRO.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2011 | 0.54 |
The correlation between HMUD.L and HPRO.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMUD.L vs. HPRO.L — Risk / Return Rank
HMUD.L
HPRO.L
HMUD.L vs. HPRO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) and HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMUD.L | HPRO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.13 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 0.82 | +1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.71 | 2.81 | +8.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMUD.L | HPRO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 0.72 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | -0.12 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | 0.02 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.11 | +0.78 |
Drawdowns
HMUD.L vs. HPRO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMUD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.30%, smaller than the maximum HPRO.L drawdown of -42.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMUD.L and HPRO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMUD.L | HPRO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.30% | -42.35% | +8.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -10.50% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.47% | -19.21% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.47% | -37.63% | +12.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.30% | -42.35% | +8.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -15.51% | +15.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.05% | -12.20% | +8.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 3.07% | -1.19% |
Volatility
HMUD.L vs. HPRO.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) is 2.80%, while HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRO.L) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that HMUD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HPRO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMUD.L | HPRO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.80% | 3.53% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.21% | 9.24% | -1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.23% | 11.89% | -0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 16.24% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 17.17% | -0.81% |
HMUD.L vs. HPRO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMUD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than HPRO.L's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMUD.L vs. HPRO.L - Dividend Comparison
HMUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than HPRO.L's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMUD.L HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 0.92% | 0.95% | 0.82% | 0.97% | 1.07% | 0.78% | 1.11% | 1.22% | 1.45% | 1.24% | 1.43% | 1.43% |
HPRO.L HSBC FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMUD.L and HPRO.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HPRO.L is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HPRO.L is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HMUD.L.
HMUD.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HPRO.L is REIT. HMUD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while HPRO.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HMUD.L and 0.24% for HPRO.L.
Find the right allocation for HMUD.L and HPRO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer