HMUD.L vs. HMAF.L
HMUD.L (HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF) and HMAF.L (HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - HMUD.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while HMAF.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HMUD.L returned 14.60%/yr vs 11.72%/yr for HMAF.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HMUD.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HMAF.L.
Performance
HMUD.L vs. HMAF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HMUD.L is traded in USD, while HMAF.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HMAF.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMUD.L achieves a 8.09% return, which is significantly lower than HMAF.L's 39.16% return. Over the past 10 years, HMUD.L has outperformed HMAF.L with an annualized return of 14.60%, while HMAF.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.72% annualized return.
HMUD.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 8.09%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- 1Y
- 22.04%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
HMAF.L
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 13.24%
- YTD
- 39.16%
- 6M
- 43.08%
- 1Y
- 78.63%
- 3Y*
- 29.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.70%
- 10Y*
- 11.72%
HMUD.L vs. HMAF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMUD.L HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 8.09% | 13.89% | 25.06% | 27.46% | -20.22% | 27.36% | 20.72% | 30.48% | -5.72% | 21.56% |
HMAF.L HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD | 39.16% | 41.71% | 11.89% | 1.27% | -21.95% | -8.41% | 25.44% | 18.44% | -15.14% | 41.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMUD.L and HMAF.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2013 | 0.61 |
The correlation between HMUD.L and HMAF.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMUD.L vs. HMAF.L — Risk / Return Rank
HMUD.L
HMAF.L
HMUD.L vs. HMAF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) and HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (HMAF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMUD.L | HMAF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.65 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 6.06 | -3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.71 | 21.89 | -10.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMUD.L | HMAF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 3.79 | -1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.41 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | 0.57 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.44 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
HMUD.L vs. HMAF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMUD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.30%, smaller than the maximum HMAF.L drawdown of -50.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMUD.L and HMAF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMUD.L | HMAF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.30% | -50.09% | +15.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -12.91% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.47% | -19.46% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.47% | -45.64% | +20.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.30% | -50.09% | +15.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -1.01% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.05% | -16.50% | +12.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 3.58% | -1.70% |
Volatility
HMUD.L vs. HMAF.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) is 2.80%, while HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (HMAF.L) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that HMUD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMAF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMUD.L | HMAF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.80% | 9.13% | -6.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.21% | 17.44% | -9.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.23% | 20.66% | -9.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 21.29% | -5.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 20.36% | -4.00% |
HMUD.L vs. HMAF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMUD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than HMAF.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMUD.L vs. HMAF.L - Dividend Comparison
HMUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while HMAF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMAF.L HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% |
HMUD.L HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 0.92% | 0.95% | 0.82% | 0.97% | 1.07% | 0.78% | 1.11% | 1.22% | 1.45% | 1.24% | 1.43% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMUD.L and HMAF.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HMUD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMUD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HMAF.L.
HMUD.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HMAF.L is Asia Pacific Equities. HMUD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while HMAF.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HMUD.L and 0.45% for HMAF.L.
Find the right allocation for HMUD.L and HMAF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer