HMUD.L vs. CAPU.L
HMUD.L (HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF) and CAPU.L (Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from HSBC and Natixis respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HMUD.L returned 14.60%/yr vs 13.39%/yr for CAPU.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HMUD.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CAPU.L.
Performance
HMUD.L vs. CAPU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HMUD.L is traded in USD, while CAPU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CAPU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMUD.L achieves a 8.09% return, which is significantly higher than CAPU.L's -1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, HMUD.L has outperformed CAPU.L with an annualized return of 14.60%, while CAPU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.39% annualized return.
HMUD.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 8.09%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- 1Y
- 22.04%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
CAPU.L
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- -1.40%
- 6M
- -0.41%
- 1Y
- 5.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 8.40%
- 10Y*
- 13.39%
HMUD.L vs. CAPU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMUD.L HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 8.09% | 13.89% | 25.06% | 27.46% | -20.22% | 27.36% | 20.72% | 30.48% | -5.72% | 21.56% |
CAPU.L Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust | -1.40% | 9.41% | 15.93% | 28.24% | -15.37% | 28.44% | 17.74% | 31.11% | -4.42% | 19.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMUD.L and CAPU.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2015 | 0.84 |
The correlation between HMUD.L and CAPU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMUD.L vs. CAPU.L — Risk / Return Rank
HMUD.L
CAPU.L
HMUD.L vs. CAPU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) and Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMUD.L | CAPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.10 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 0.63 | +2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.71 | 1.98 | +9.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMUD.L | CAPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 0.56 | +1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.55 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | 0.83 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.77 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
HMUD.L vs. CAPU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMUD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.30%, roughly equal to the maximum CAPU.L drawdown of -34.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMUD.L and CAPU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMUD.L | CAPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.30% | -34.23% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -9.12% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.47% | -13.99% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.47% | -21.13% | -4.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.30% | -34.23% | -0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -5.61% | +5.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.05% | -3.80% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 2.91% | -1.03% |
Volatility
HMUD.L vs. CAPU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) is 2.80%, while Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that HMUD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAPU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMUD.L | CAPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.80% | 3.42% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.21% | 7.86% | +0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.23% | 10.23% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 15.24% | +0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 16.24% | +0.12% |
HMUD.L vs. CAPU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMUD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CAPU.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMUD.L vs. CAPU.L - Dividend Comparison
HMUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while CAPU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPU.L Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HMUD.L HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 0.92% | 0.95% | 0.82% | 0.97% | 1.07% | 0.78% | 1.11% | 1.22% | 1.45% | 1.24% | 1.43% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMUD.L and CAPU.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HMUD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMUD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CAPU.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HMUD.L and 0.65% for CAPU.L.
Find the right allocation for HMUD.L and CAPU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer