HMJP.L vs. LGJG.L
HMJP.L (HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD) and LGJG.L (L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from HSBC and Legal & General respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HMJP.L returned 10.21%/yr vs 10.06%/yr for LGJG.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HMJP.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LGJG.L.
Performance
HMJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMJP.L achieves a 16.35% return, which is significantly higher than LGJG.L's 14.69% return.
HMJP.L
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 6.17%
- YTD
- 16.35%
- 6M
- 15.48%
- 1Y
- 33.99%
- 3Y*
- 15.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.30%
LGJG.L
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 6.18%
- YTD
- 14.69%
- 6M
- 14.39%
- 1Y
- 31.74%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- —
HMJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMJP.L HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD | 16.35% | 17.44% | 9.05% | 14.01% | -7.12% | 2.09% | 12.36% | 10.95% |
LGJG.L L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF | 14.69% | 17.46% | 10.01% | 13.64% | -6.84% | 1.78% | 13.24% | 11.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMJP.L and LGJG.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2019 | 0.93 |
The correlation between HMJP.L and LGJG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
HMJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HMJP.L
LGJG.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
HMJP.L
LGJG.L
Technology
HMJP.L
LGJG.L
Financial Services
HMJP.L
LGJG.L
Consumer Cyclical
HMJP.L
LGJG.L
Communication Services
HMJP.L
LGJG.L
Healthcare
HMJP.L
LGJG.L
Consumer Defensive
HMJP.L
LGJG.L
Basic Materials
HMJP.L
LGJG.L
Real Estate
HMJP.L
LGJG.L
Utilities
HMJP.L
LGJG.L
Energy
HMJP.L
LGJG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMJP.L vs. LGJG.L — Risk / Return Rank
HMJP.L
LGJG.L
HMJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (HMJP.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMJP.L | LGJG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 2.86 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.15 | 9.27 | +0.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMJP.L | LGJG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 1.79 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.64 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
HMJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMJP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.24%, which is greater than LGJG.L's maximum drawdown of -22.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMJP.L and LGJG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMJP.L | LGJG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.24% | -22.92% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.83% | -11.04% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.29% | -13.84% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.50% | -18.20% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -0.18% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.98% | -5.15% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 3.42% | -0.08% |
Volatility
HMJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (HMJP.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L) have volatilities of 3.74% and 3.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMJP.L | LGJG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 3.71% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.72% | 14.24% | +0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.31% | 17.63% | +0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.93% | 15.58% | +0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 16.81% | -0.80% |
HMJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMJP.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than LGJG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HMJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Dividend Comparison
HMJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, while LGJG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMJP.L HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD | 1.49% | 1.74% | 1.64% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.53% | 1.68% | 1.83% | 1.73% | 1.41% | 1.27% | 1.10% |
LGJG.L L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, HMJP.L and LGJG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LGJG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGJG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for HMJP.L.
Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for HMJP.L and 0.10% for LGJG.L.
Find the right allocation for HMJP.L and LGJG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer