HMJP.L vs. HWWA.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HMJP.L (HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD) and HWWA.L (HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HMJP.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while HWWA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HMJP.L returned 10.30%/yr vs 13.22%/yr for HWWA.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HMJP.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HWWA.L.

Performance

HMJP.L vs. HWWA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (HMJP.L) and HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HMJP.L is traded in GBp, while HWWA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HWWA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMJP.L achieves a 16.35% return, which is significantly higher than HWWA.L's 13.69% return. Over the past 10 years, HMJP.L has underperformed HWWA.L with an annualized return of 10.30%, while HWWA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.22% annualized return.

HMJP.L

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 6.17%
• YTD: 16.35%
• 6M: 15.48%
• 1Y: 33.99%
• 3Y*: 15.60%
• 5Y*: 10.21%
• 10Y*: 10.30%

HWWA.L

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 5.53%
• YTD: 13.69%
• 6M: 14.69%
• 1Y: 34.30%
• 3Y*: 19.39%
• 5Y*: 12.99%
• 10Y*: 13.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMJP.L vs. HWWA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HMJP.L HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD	16.35%	17.44%	9.05%	14.01%	-7.12%	2.09%	12.36%	14.51%	-8.64%	13.37%
HWWA.L HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF	13.69%	16.74%	17.83%	15.71%	-7.83%	21.70%	11.03%	18.57%	-5.55%	12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between HMJP.L and HWWA.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2014	0.70

The correlation between HMJP.L and HWWA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

HMJP.L vs. HWWA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HMJP.L	HWWA.L
Industrials	24.7%	13.2%
Technology	20.8%	34.2%
Financial Services	17.6%	14.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.0%	8.3%
Communication Services	8.8%	8.4%
Healthcare	5.8%	5.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	2.2%
Basic Materials	2.9%	5.8%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.4%
Utilities	1.0%	2.5%
Energy	1.0%	4.2%

Return for Risk

HMJP.L vs. HWWA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMJP.L

HMJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 58
HMJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
HMJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
HMJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 58
HMJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
HMJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

HWWA.L

HWWA.L Risk / Return Rank: 91
HWWA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
HWWA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
HWWA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 93
HWWA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
HWWA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMJP.L vs. HWWA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (HMJP.L) and HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HMJP.L	HWWA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	3.34	-1.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	4.56	-1.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.64	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	5.06	-1.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.15	21.35	-11.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HMJP.L vs. HWWA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the HWWA.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMJP.L and HWWA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HMJP.L	HWWA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.85	3.34	-1.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	1.02	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	0.92	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.83	-0.35

Drawdowns

HMJP.L vs. HWWA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMJP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.24%, roughly equal to the maximum HWWA.L drawdown of -25.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMJP.L and HWWA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HMJP.L	HWWA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.24%	-25.12%	+0.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.83%	-6.74%	-4.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.29%	-16.79%	+2.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.50%	-16.79%	-1.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.24%	-25.12%	+0.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-0.35%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.98%	-3.53%	-3.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	1.60%	+1.74%

Volatility

HMJP.L vs. HWWA.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (HMJP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) at 3.48%. This indicates that HMJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWWA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HMJP.L	HWWA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	3.48%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.72%	7.85%	+6.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.31%	10.23%	+8.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.93%	12.69%	+3.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.01%	14.32%	+1.69%

HMJP.L vs. HWWA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMJP.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than HWWA.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HMJP.L vs. HWWA.L - Dividend Comparison

HMJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than HWWA.L's 1.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HMJP.L HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD	1.49%	1.74%	1.64%	1.75%	1.98%	1.53%	1.68%	1.83%	1.73%	1.41%	1.27%	1.10%
HWWA.L HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF	1.29%	1.43%	1.58%	1.95%	2.07%	1.48%	1.45%	2.07%	2.10%	1.86%	1.71%	1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HMJP.L and HWWA.L in my portfolio?

HMJP.L and HWWA.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HMJP.L or HWWA.L?

On fees, HMJP.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HMJP.L or HWWA.L?

HMJP.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HWWA.L.

What is the main difference between HMJP.L and HWWA.L?

HMJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while HWWA.L is Global Equities. HMJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while HWWA.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for HMJP.L and 0.25% for HWWA.L.