HMJD.L vs. LGJP.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

HMJD.L (HSBC MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF) and LGJP.L (L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - HMJD.L tracks the HSBC MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF while LGJP.L tracks the L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HMJD.L returned 9.43%/yr vs 9.51%/yr for LGJP.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HMJD.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LGJP.L.

Performance

HMJD.L vs. LGJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF (HMJD.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HMJD.L having a 15.59% return and LGJP.L slightly lower at 15.08%.

HMJD.L

• 1D: -1.92%
• 1M: -1.20%
• 6M: 9.27%
• YTD: 15.59%
• 1Y: 35.30%
• 3Y*: 17.87%
• 5Y*: 9.43%
• 10Y*: 9.30%

LGJP.L

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: -0.39%
• 6M: 9.30%
• YTD: 15.08%
• 1Y: 33.92%
• 3Y*: 17.92%
• 5Y*: 9.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMJD.L vs. LGJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HMJD.L HSBC MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF	15.59%	26.14%	7.23%	20.68%	-17.07%	0.77%	16.33%	18.26%	-7.69%
LGJP.L L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF	15.08%	25.67%	8.35%	20.25%	-16.76%	1.05%	16.58%	18.59%	-7.06%

Correlation

The correlation between HMJD.L and LGJP.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018	0.98

The correlation between HMJD.L and LGJP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HMJD.L vs. LGJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMJD.L

HMJD.L Risk / Return Rank: 63
HMJD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
HMJD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
HMJD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 62
HMJD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
HMJD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 63

LGJP.L

LGJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 60
LGJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
LGJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
LGJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 59
LGJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
LGJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMJD.L vs. LGJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF (HMJD.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HMJD.L	LGJP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	1.58	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	2.28	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.29	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	2.53	+0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.93	8.18	+0.74

HMJD.L vs. LGJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMJD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the LGJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMJD.L and LGJP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HMJD.L vs. LGJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMJD.L drawdown since its inception was -32.38%, roughly equal to the maximum LGJP.L drawdown of -32.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMJD.L and LGJP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HMJD.L	LGJP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.38%	-32.19%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.71%	-13.20%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.76%	-14.30%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.38%	-32.19%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.52%	-3.27%	-1.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.51%	-7.57%	-0.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.95%	4.08%	-0.13%

Volatility

HMJD.L vs. LGJP.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF (HMJD.L) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJP.L) at 6.42%. This indicates that HMJD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGJP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HMJD.L	LGJP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.08%	6.42%	+0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.96%	17.61%	+0.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.58%	21.09%	+0.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.44%	18.15%	+0.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.10%	18.30%	-1.20%

HMJD.L vs. LGJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMJD.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than LGJP.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HMJD.L vs. LGJP.L - Dividend Comparison

HMJD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, while LGJP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HMJD.L HSBC MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF	1.51%	1.68%	1.66%	1.72%	2.06%	1.56%	1.57%	1.77%	1.84%	1.35%	1.40%	1.14%
LGJP.L L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HMJD.L and LGJP.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, HMJD.L and LGJP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, HMJD.L or LGJP.L?

On fees, LGJP.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HMJD.L or LGJP.L?

LGJP.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for HMJD.L.

What is the main difference between HMJD.L and LGJP.L?

HMJD.L tracks HSBC MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF, while LGJP.L tracks L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for HMJD.L and 0.10% for LGJP.L.