PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMJD.L vs. DXJA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMJD.L vs. DXJA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF (HMJD.L) and WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (DXJA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMJD.L achieves a 15.59% return, which is significantly lower than DXJA.L's 23.53% return.


HMJD.L

1D
-1.92%
1M
-1.20%
6M
9.27%
YTD
15.59%
1Y
35.30%
3Y*
17.87%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*
9.30%

DXJA.L

1D
-0.74%
1M
2.08%
6M
15.31%
YTD
23.53%
1Y
55.91%
3Y*
33.11%
5Y*
27.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMJD.L vs. DXJA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HMJD.L
HSBC MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF
15.59%26.14%7.23%20.68%-17.07%0.77%16.33%18.26%-13.65%19.56%
DXJA.L
WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc
23.53%33.46%28.94%41.24%6.24%17.35%4.48%17.49%-18.94%18.13%

Correlation

The correlation between HMJD.L and DXJA.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017

0.79

The correlation between HMJD.L and DXJA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMJD.L vs. DXJA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMJD.L
HMJD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
HMJD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMJD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMJD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HMJD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMJD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

DXJA.L
DXJA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DXJA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMJD.L vs. DXJA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF (HMJD.L) and WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (DXJA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HMJD.LDXJA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.49

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

5.51

-2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.93

18.98

-10.06

HMJD.L vs. DXJA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMJD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the DXJA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMJD.L and DXJA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HMJD.L vs. DXJA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMJD.L drawdown since its inception was -32.38%, smaller than the maximum DXJA.L drawdown of -37.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMJD.L and DXJA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMJD.LDXJA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.38%

-37.51%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.71%

-10.10%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.76%

-23.01%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.38%

-23.01%

-9.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.52%

-1.57%

-2.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.51%

-6.66%

-1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

2.94%

+1.01%

Volatility

HMJD.L vs. DXJA.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF (HMJD.L) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (DXJA.L) at 5.86%. This indicates that HMJD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXJA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMJD.LDXJA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.08%

5.86%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.96%

16.15%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.58%

20.12%

+1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.44%

19.40%

-0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%

19.24%

-2.14%

HMJD.L vs. DXJA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMJD.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DXJA.L's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

HMJD.L vs. DXJA.L - Dividend Comparison

HMJD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, while DXJA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXJA.L
WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HMJD.L
HSBC MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF
1.51%1.68%1.66%1.72%2.06%1.56%1.57%1.77%1.84%1.35%1.40%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


HMJD.L and DXJA.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HMJD.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HMJD.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJA.L.

HMJD.L tracks HSBC MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF, while DXJA.L tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for HMJD.L and 0.48% for DXJA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMJD.L and DXJA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer