HMEU.L vs. MIBX.L
HMEU.L (HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF) and MIBX.L (Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds - HMEU.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while MIBX.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HMEU.L returned 10.86%/yr vs 17.49%/yr for MIBX.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HMEU.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MIBX.L.
Performance
HMEU.L vs. MIBX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMEU.L achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly lower than MIBX.L's 17.04% return. Over the past 10 years, HMEU.L has underperformed MIBX.L with an annualized return of 10.86%, while MIBX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.49% annualized return.
HMEU.L
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 22.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.86%
MIBX.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 17.04%
- 6M
- 17.60%
- 1Y
- 38.44%
- 3Y*
- 29.72%
- 5Y*
- 20.55%
- 10Y*
- 17.49%
HMEU.L vs. MIBX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMEU.L HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF | 8.72% | 25.88% | 3.54% | 13.28% | -3.35% | 17.08% | 2.26% | 19.75% | -9.42% | 14.90% |
MIBX.L Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist | 17.04% | 43.78% | 13.17% | 30.61% | -3.53% | 18.16% | 1.49% | 25.15% | -12.72% | 21.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMEU.L and MIBX.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2010 | 0.81 |
The correlation between HMEU.L and MIBX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
HMEU.L vs. MIBX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HMEU.L
MIBX.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
HMEU.L
MIBX.L
Industrials
HMEU.L
MIBX.L
Healthcare
HMEU.L
MIBX.L
Technology
HMEU.L
MIBX.L
Consumer Defensive
HMEU.L
MIBX.L
Consumer Cyclical
HMEU.L
MIBX.L
Basic Materials
HMEU.L
MIBX.L
Energy
HMEU.L
MIBX.L
Utilities
HMEU.L
MIBX.L
Communication Services
HMEU.L
MIBX.L
Real Estate
HMEU.L
MIBX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMEU.L vs. MIBX.L — Risk / Return Rank
HMEU.L
MIBX.L
HMEU.L vs. MIBX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (HMEU.L) and Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HMEU.L | MIBX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.44 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 3.73 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.61 | 13.56 | -5.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HMEU.L vs. MIBX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMEU.L drawdown since its inception was -29.95%, smaller than the maximum MIBX.L drawdown of -67.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMEU.L and MIBX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMEU.L | MIBX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.95% | -67.93% | +37.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -10.26% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.77% | -15.64% | +2.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.46% | -24.06% | +8.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.42% | -35.10% | +6.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -2.69% | +2.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.06% | -39.84% | +33.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 2.83% | +0.10% |
Volatility
HMEU.L vs. MIBX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (HMEU.L) is 2.92%, while Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that HMEU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIBX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMEU.L | MIBX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 3.85% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.40% | 12.39% | -1.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 15.10% | -2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 17.95% | -4.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.78% | 18.93% | -4.15% |
HMEU.L vs. MIBX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMEU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MIBX.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMEU.L vs. MIBX.L - Dividend Comparison
HMEU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than MIBX.L's 3.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMEU.L HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF | 1.81% | 2.55% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 2.85% | 2.16% | 2.13% | 3.10% | 3.29% | 2.77% | 2.81% | 2.62% |
MIBX.L Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist | 3.15% | 3.68% | 3.93% | 3.73% | 3.88% | 2.09% | 1.55% | 4.02% | 4.05% | 2.75% | 3.56% | 3.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMEU.L and MIBX.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HMEU.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMEU.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MIBX.L.
HMEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while MIBX.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HMEU.L and 0.35% for MIBX.L.
Find the right allocation for HMEU.L and MIBX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer