PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMEU.L vs. LCPE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (HMEU.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMEU.L achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 14.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HMEU.L having a 10.50% annualized return and LCPE.L not far behind at 10.16%.


HMEU.L

1D
0.61%
1M
3.46%
YTD
6.73%
6M
8.70%
1Y
19.15%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
10.50%

LCPE.L

1D
0.39%
1M
3.01%
YTD
14.20%
6M
14.45%
1Y
27.63%
3Y*
11.83%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
10.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HMEU.L
HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF
6.73%25.88%6.23%13.28%-3.35%17.08%2.26%19.72%-9.45%15.34%
LCPE.L
Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS
14.20%18.88%-2.83%10.70%0.29%16.28%8.38%12.94%-2.26%9.54%

Correlation

The correlation between HMEU.L and LCPE.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015

0.41

Over the past year, HMEU.L and LCPE.L have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.

HMEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HMEU.L
LCPE.L

Financial Services

23.2%

-

Industrials

19.8%
0.2%

Healthcare

13.1%
32.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
32.8%

Technology

8.5%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
1.9%

Basic Materials

5.6%
32.3%

Energy

5.3%
0.0%

Utilities

5.0%

-

Communication Services

3.7%
0.0%

Real Estate

0.8%
0.0%

Financial Services

HMEU.L
23.2%
LCPE.L

-

Industrials

HMEU.L
19.8%
LCPE.L
0.2%

Healthcare

HMEU.L
13.1%
LCPE.L
32.6%

Consumer Defensive

HMEU.L
8.7%
LCPE.L
32.8%

Technology

HMEU.L
8.5%
LCPE.L
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

HMEU.L
6.3%
LCPE.L
1.9%

Basic Materials

HMEU.L
5.6%
LCPE.L
32.3%

Energy

HMEU.L
5.3%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Utilities

HMEU.L
5.0%
LCPE.L

-

Communication Services

HMEU.L
3.7%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Real Estate

HMEU.L
0.8%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMEU.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMEU.L
HMEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
HMEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
HMEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

LCPE.L
LCPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (HMEU.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HMEU.LLCPE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.43

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

4.13

-2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.52

13.66

-7.14

HMEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMEU.L and LCPE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HMEU.LLCPE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

2.44

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

1.04

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

1.20

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.98

-0.34

Drawdowns

HMEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMEU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.42%, which is greater than LCPE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMEU.L and LCPE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMEU.LLCPE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.42%

-27.05%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-6.66%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.77%

-12.39%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.46%

-12.39%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.42%

-27.05%

-1.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-2.71%

+1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-3.52%

-1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

2.02%

+0.91%

Volatility

HMEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (HMEU.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) have volatilities of 3.84% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMEU.LLCPE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

3.81%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.19%

8.48%

+1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

11.29%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.81%

17.74%

-3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.47%

20.60%

-5.13%

HMEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMEU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

HMEU.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison

HMEU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, while LCPE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMEU.L
HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF
2.44%2.55%5.65%2.80%2.85%2.16%2.13%3.10%3.29%2.77%2.82%5.28%
LCPE.L
Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HMEU.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HMEU.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HMEU.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HMEU.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMEU.L and LCPE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer