PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMEU.L vs. CEUR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (HMEU.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HMEU.L having a 6.73% return and CEUR.L slightly lower at 6.66%. Over the past 10 years, HMEU.L has outperformed CEUR.L with an annualized return of 10.50%, while CEUR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.88% annualized return.


HMEU.L

1D
0.61%
1M
3.46%
YTD
6.73%
6M
8.70%
1Y
19.15%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
10.50%

CEUR.L

1D
0.46%
1M
3.94%
YTD
6.66%
6M
8.98%
1Y
19.26%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
9.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HMEU.L
HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF
6.73%25.88%6.23%13.28%-3.35%17.08%2.26%19.72%-9.45%15.34%
CEUR.L
Amundi MSCI Europe
6.66%24.46%4.90%12.93%-5.96%17.02%2.29%19.59%-9.49%14.99%

Correlation

The correlation between HMEU.L and CEUR.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011

0.81

The correlation between HMEU.L and CEUR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.97 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HMEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HMEU.L
CEUR.L

Financial Services

23.2%
25.1%

Industrials

19.8%
19.8%

Healthcare

13.1%
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
7.2%

Technology

8.5%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
6.2%

Basic Materials

5.6%
3.8%

Energy

5.3%
3.5%

Utilities

5.0%
5.3%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.4%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.7%

Financial Services

HMEU.L
23.2%
CEUR.L
25.1%

Industrials

HMEU.L
19.8%
CEUR.L
19.8%

Healthcare

HMEU.L
13.1%
CEUR.L
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

HMEU.L
8.7%
CEUR.L
7.2%

Technology

HMEU.L
8.5%
CEUR.L
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

HMEU.L
6.3%
CEUR.L
6.2%

Basic Materials

HMEU.L
5.6%
CEUR.L
3.8%

Energy

HMEU.L
5.3%
CEUR.L
3.5%

Utilities

HMEU.L
5.0%
CEUR.L
5.3%

Communication Services

HMEU.L
3.7%
CEUR.L
3.4%

Real Estate

HMEU.L
0.8%
CEUR.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMEU.L vs. CEUR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMEU.L
HMEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
HMEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
HMEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

CEUR.L
CEUR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (HMEU.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HMEU.LCEUR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.74

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.52

6.06

+0.46

HMEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMEU.L and CEUR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HMEU.LCEUR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

1.54

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.68

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.66

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.56

+0.09

Drawdowns

HMEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMEU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.42%, roughly equal to the maximum CEUR.L drawdown of -28.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMEU.L and CEUR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMEU.LCEUR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.42%

-28.63%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-11.05%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.77%

-12.66%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.46%

-17.85%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.42%

-28.63%

+0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-1.52%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-4.58%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.17%

-0.24%

Volatility

HMEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (HMEU.L) is 3.84%, while Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that HMEU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEUR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMEU.LCEUR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

4.25%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.19%

10.53%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

12.44%

-0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.81%

13.88%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.47%

14.97%

+0.50%

HMEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMEU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CEUR.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HMEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Dividend Comparison

HMEU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, while CEUR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEUR.L
Amundi MSCI Europe
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HMEU.L
HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF
2.44%2.55%5.65%2.80%2.85%2.16%2.13%3.10%3.29%2.77%2.82%5.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, HMEU.L and CEUR.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CEUR.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEUR.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HMEU.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HMEU.L and 0.05% for CEUR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMEU.L and CEUR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer