HMDYX vs. EEOFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HMDYX (The Hartford MidCap Fund) and EEOFX (Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, HMDYX returned 0.82%/yr vs 4.48%/yr for EEOFX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HMDYX charges 0.79%/yr vs 2.11%/yr for EEOFX.

Performance

HMDYX vs. EEOFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Hartford MidCap Fund (HMDYX) and Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMDYX achieves a 9.83% return, which is significantly lower than EEOFX's 31.64% return.

HMDYX

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 5.82%
• YTD: 9.83%
• 6M: 8.15%
• 1Y: 9.30%
• 3Y*: 8.00%
• 5Y*: 0.82%
• 10Y*: 9.08%

EEOFX

• 1D: 2.36%
• 1M: 13.45%
• YTD: 31.64%
• 6M: 30.83%
• 1Y: 58.76%
• 3Y*: 15.30%
• 5Y*: 4.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMDYX vs. EEOFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HMDYX The Hartford MidCap Fund	9.83%	-0.48%	6.17%	14.70%	-24.01%	9.89%	25.10%	38.80%	-7.56%	9.95%
EEOFX Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund	31.64%	23.55%	1.32%	-1.53%	-27.88%	10.83%	62.80%	25.43%	-15.79%	3.20%

Correlation

The correlation between HMDYX and EEOFX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2017	0.82

The correlation between HMDYX and EEOFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HMDYX vs. EEOFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMDYX

HMDYX Risk / Return Rank: 7
HMDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
HMDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
HMDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
HMDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
HMDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

EEOFX

EEOFX Risk / Return Rank: 79
EEOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
EEOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
EEOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
EEOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
EEOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMDYX vs. EEOFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Hartford MidCap Fund (HMDYX) and Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HMDYX	EEOFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	2.77	-2.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.93	3.62	-2.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.44	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	4.60	-3.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.96	15.34	-13.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HMDYX vs. EEOFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMDYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the EEOFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMDYX and EEOFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HMDYX	EEOFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56	2.77	-2.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	0.18	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.41	+0.12

Drawdowns

HMDYX vs. EEOFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMDYX drawdown since its inception was -50.76%, roughly equal to the maximum EEOFX drawdown of -50.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMDYX and EEOFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HMDYX	EEOFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.76%	-50.17%	-0.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.91%	-13.49%	-2.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.77%	-31.32%	+4.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.92%	-50.17%	+17.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.65%	0.00%	-1.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.89%	-19.65%	+10.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.31%	4.02%	+1.29%

Volatility

HMDYX vs. EEOFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Hartford MidCap Fund (HMDYX) is 5.21%, while Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX) has a volatility of 8.86%. This indicates that HMDYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEOFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HMDYX	EEOFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.21%	8.86%	-3.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.84%	17.02%	-2.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.60%	22.43%	-3.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.67%	25.02%	-3.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.56%	24.79%	-3.23%

HMDYX vs. EEOFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMDYX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EEOFX's 2.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

HMDYX vs. EEOFX - Dividend Comparison

HMDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.91%, more than EEOFX's 0.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEOFX Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund	0.05%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	6.63%	1.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HMDYX The Hartford MidCap Fund	16.91%	18.58%	4.80%	1.73%	7.40%	10.29%	9.17%	8.60%	11.42%	3.95%	2.61%	7.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HMDYX and EEOFX in my portfolio?

HMDYX and EEOFX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HMDYX or EEOFX?

EEOFX has higher volatility (8.86%) compared to HMDYX (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HMDYX dropped -50.76% vs EEOFX's -50.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EEOFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.