HMAX.TO vs. QQCI.TO
HMAX.TO (Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer ETF) and QQCI.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HMAX.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton, while QQCI.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HMAX.TO returned 41.14% vs 24.09% for QQCI.TO. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HMAX.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for QQCI.TO.
Performance
HMAX.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMAX.TO achieves a 19.57% return, which is significantly higher than QQCI.TO's 11.99% return.
HMAX.TO
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 20.59%
- YTD
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 41.14%
- 3Y*
- 23.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.20%
QQCI.TO
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- 6M
- 12.17%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 1Y
- 24.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$6.66M | CA$5.74M | CA$5.89M | |
| CA$141.03K | CA$115.67K | CA$152.23K |
HMAX.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HMAX.TO Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer ETF | 19.57% | 27.16% | 12.02% |
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF | 11.99% | 12.64% | 11.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMAX.TO and QQCI.TO is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2024 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMAX.TO vs. QQCI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HMAX.TO
QQCI.TO
HMAX.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (HMAX.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HMAX.TO | QQCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 1.26 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.52 | 2.59 | +2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.60 | 8.57 | +15.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HMAX.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.34%, smaller than the maximum QQCI.TO drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMAX.TO and QQCI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMAX.TO | QQCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.34% | -18.95% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.29% | -8.48% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -5.84% | +4.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.83% | -3.07% | +0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.70% | 2.56% | -0.86% |
Volatility
HMAX.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (HMAX.TO) is 3.82%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that HMAX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQCI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMAX.TO | QQCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 4.91% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 11.52% | -2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.55% | 14.92% | -4.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.38% | 15.92% | -4.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.38% | 15.92% | -4.54% |
HMAX.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMAX.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QQCI.TO's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMAX.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Dividend Comparison
HMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.01%, more than QQCI.TO's 9.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HMAX.TO Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer ETF | 11.01% | 12.29% | 14.08% | 15.47% |
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF | 9.32% | 9.34% | 3.17% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMAX.TO and QQCI.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQCI.TO is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQCI.TO is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HMAX.TO.
HMAX.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQCI.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and CI. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HMAX.TO and 0.21% for QQCI.TO.
Find the right allocation for HMAX.TO and QQCI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer