PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMAX.TO vs. QQCI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMAX.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (HMAX.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMAX.TO achieves a 19.57% return, which is significantly higher than QQCI.TO's 11.99% return.


HMAX.TO

1D
0.16%
1M
0.93%
6M
20.59%
YTD
19.57%
1Y
41.14%
3Y*
23.17%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.20%

QQCI.TO

1D
1.04%
1M
-4.23%
6M
12.17%
YTD
11.99%
1Y
24.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$6.66MCA$5.74MCA$5.89M
CA$141.03KCA$115.67KCA$152.23K

HMAX.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HMAX.TO
Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer ETF
19.57%27.16%12.02%
QQCI.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF
11.99%12.64%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between HMAX.TO and QQCI.TO is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2024

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMAX.TO vs. QQCI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HMAX.TO
HMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
HMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

QQCI.TO
QQCI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HMAX.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (HMAX.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HMAX.TOQQCI.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.26

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.52

2.59

+2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.60

8.57

+15.03

HMAX.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.82, which is higher than the QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMAX.TO and QQCI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HMAX.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.34%, smaller than the maximum QQCI.TO drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMAX.TO and QQCI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMAX.TOQQCI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.34%

-18.95%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-8.48%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-5.84%

+4.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.83%

-3.07%

+0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

2.56%

-0.86%

Volatility

HMAX.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (HMAX.TO) is 3.82%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that HMAX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQCI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMAX.TOQQCI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

4.91%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

11.52%

-2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.55%

14.92%

-4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.38%

15.92%

-4.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.38%

15.92%

-4.54%

HMAX.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMAX.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QQCI.TO's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

HMAX.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Dividend Comparison

HMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.01%, more than QQCI.TO's 9.32% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
HMAX.TO
Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer ETF
11.01%12.29%14.08%15.47%
QQCI.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF
9.32%9.34%3.17%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HMAX.TO and QQCI.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQCI.TO is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQCI.TO is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HMAX.TO.

HMAX.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQCI.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and CI. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HMAX.TO and 0.21% for QQCI.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMAX.TO and QQCI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer