HMAX.TO vs. QDAY.NEO
HMAX.TO (Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) and QDAY.NEO (Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Hamilton Capital. Both are actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HMAX.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for QDAY.NEO.
Performance
HMAX.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMAX.TO achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly lower than QDAY.NEO's 31.76% return.
HMAX.TO
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 11.17%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 35.28%
- 3Y*
- 21.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDAY.NEO
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 18.94%
- YTD
- 31.76%
- 6M
- 28.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HMAX.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HMAX.TO Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 11.17% | 17.66% |
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF | 31.76% | 14.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMAX.TO and QDAY.NEO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMAX.TO vs. QDAY.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
HMAX.TO
QDAY.NEO
HMAX.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (HMAX.TO) and Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMAX.TO | QDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.86 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMAX.TO | QDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.54 | 2.63 | -1.09 |
Drawdowns
HMAX.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.34%, smaller than the maximum QDAY.NEO drawdown of -19.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMAX.TO and QDAY.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMAX.TO | QDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.34% | -19.44% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | 0.00% | -0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.94% | -5.23% | +2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | — | — |
Volatility
HMAX.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMAX.TO | QDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.95% | 22.72% | -12.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.42% | 22.72% | -11.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.42% | 22.72% | -11.30% |
HMAX.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMAX.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than QDAY.NEO's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMAX.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Dividend Comparison
HMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.59%, less than QDAY.NEO's 13.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HMAX.TO Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 11.59% | 12.29% | 14.08% | 15.47% |
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF | 13.90% | 8.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMAX.TO and QDAY.NEO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HMAX.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMAX.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QDAY.NEO.
Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HMAX.TO and 0.85% for QDAY.NEO.
Find the right allocation for HMAX.TO and QDAY.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer