HMAX.TO vs. CASH.TO
HMAX.TO (Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer ETF) and CASH.TO (Global X High Interest Savings ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HMAX.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital, while CASH.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HMAX.TO returned 23.74%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for CASH.TO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HMAX.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for CASH.TO.
Performance
HMAX.TO vs. CASH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMAX.TO achieves a 19.85% return, which is significantly higher than CASH.TO's 1.06% return.
HMAX.TO
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 3.95%
- 6M
- 18.10%
- YTD
- 19.85%
- 1Y
- 41.20%
- 3Y*
- 23.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CASH.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 2.16%
- 3Y*
- 3.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HMAX.TO vs. CASH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HMAX.TO Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer ETF | 19.85% | 27.16% | 20.69% | 1.08% |
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 1.06% | 2.45% | 4.53% | 4.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMAX.TO and CASH.TO is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2023 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMAX.TO vs. CASH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HMAX.TO
CASH.TO
HMAX.TO vs. CASH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (HMAX.TO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HMAX.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -19.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.77 | 6.79 | -5.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.68 | 108.60 | -102.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.87 | 373.54 | -348.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HMAX.TO vs. CASH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.34%, which is greater than CASH.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMAX.TO and CASH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMAX.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.34% | -0.80% | -14.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.29% | -0.02% | -7.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.51% | -0.06% | -12.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | 0.00% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.85% | -0.00% | -2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 0.01% | +1.65% |
Volatility
HMAX.TO vs. CASH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (HMAX.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.45% compared to Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) at 0.06%. This indicates that HMAX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CASH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMAX.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.45% | 0.06% | +2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.73% | 0.15% | +8.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.17% | 0.23% | +9.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.35% | 0.61% | +10.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.35% | 0.61% | +10.74% |
HMAX.TO vs. CASH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMAX.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CASH.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMAX.TO vs. CASH.TO - Dividend Comparison
HMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.86%, more than CASH.TO's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 2.12% | 2.53% | 4.37% | 5.05% | 2.30% | 0.10% |
HMAX.TO Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer ETF | 10.86% | 12.29% | 14.08% | 15.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMAX.TO and CASH.TO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CASH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CASH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HMAX.TO.
HMAX.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while CASH.TO is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HMAX.TO and 0.11% for CASH.TO.
Find the right allocation for HMAX.TO and CASH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer