PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLMIX vs. FIGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLMIX vs. FIGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio (HLMIX) and Fidelity Series International Growth Fund (FIGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLMIX achieves a 14.54% return, which is significantly higher than FIGSX's 7.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HLMIX having a 9.68% annualized return and FIGSX not far ahead at 10.15%.


HLMIX

1D
-0.99%
1M
3.56%
YTD
14.54%
6M
16.22%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
15.92%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
9.68%

FIGSX

1D
-0.34%
1M
1.04%
YTD
7.12%
6M
8.12%
1Y
14.23%
3Y*
13.19%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLMIX vs. FIGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLMIX
Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio
14.54%27.63%1.18%15.10%-20.21%8.49%20.33%25.22%-13.96%29.91%
FIGSX
Fidelity Series International Growth Fund
7.12%19.12%5.93%21.74%-22.87%16.61%18.52%35.59%-10.97%30.21%

Correlation

The correlation between HLMIX and FIGSX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2009

0.93

The correlation between HLMIX and FIGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLMIX vs. FIGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLMIX
HLMIX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
HLMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
HLMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FIGSX
FIGSX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FIGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FIGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLMIX vs. FIGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio (HLMIX) and Fidelity Series International Growth Fund (FIGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLMIXFIGSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.16

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

1.08

+1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.63

3.99

+6.64

HLMIX vs. FIGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the FIGSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLMIX and FIGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLMIXFIGSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

0.82

+1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.34

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.57

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.51

-0.13

Drawdowns

HLMIX vs. FIGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLMIX drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, which is greater than FIGSX's maximum drawdown of -34.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLMIX and FIGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLMIXFIGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.03%

-34.47%

-23.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.44%

-13.89%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.98%

-16.29%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.76%

-34.47%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.76%

-34.47%

+1.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-2.48%

+1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.70%

-6.46%

-6.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

3.75%

-1.02%

Volatility

HLMIX vs. FIGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio (HLMIX) is 5.14%, while Fidelity Series International Growth Fund (FIGSX) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that HLMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLMIXFIGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

7.23%

-2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.09%

15.89%

-3.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.50%

18.25%

-3.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.94%

18.04%

-2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.49%

17.81%

-1.32%

HLMIX vs. FIGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLMIX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FIGSX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLMIX vs. FIGSX - Dividend Comparison

HLMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.04%, more than FIGSX's 8.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIGSX
Fidelity Series International Growth Fund
8.09%8.67%4.29%1.27%3.53%8.33%16.24%3.64%7.47%3.14%2.54%3.54%
HLMIX
Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio
13.04%14.94%7.14%3.79%2.51%2.48%0.75%1.59%1.50%1.64%0.98%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, HLMIX and FIGSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIGSX has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to HLMIX (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLMIX dropped -58.03% vs FIGSX's -34.47%.

HLMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLMIX and FIGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer