PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLMIX vs. FEUPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLMIX vs. FEUPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio (HLMIX) and American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class F-3 (FEUPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLMIX achieves a 14.54% return, which is significantly higher than FEUPX's 11.42% return.


HLMIX

1D
-0.99%
1M
3.56%
YTD
14.54%
6M
16.22%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
15.92%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
9.68%

FEUPX

1D
-0.81%
1M
5.61%
YTD
11.42%
6M
13.84%
1Y
27.50%
3Y*
16.05%
5Y*
5.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLMIX vs. FEUPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLMIX
Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio
14.54%27.63%1.18%15.10%-20.21%8.49%20.33%25.22%-13.96%23.73%
FEUPX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class F-3
11.42%29.34%3.00%16.12%-22.78%2.86%25.24%27.42%-17.33%22.64%

Correlation

The correlation between HLMIX and FEUPX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.92

The correlation between HLMIX and FEUPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLMIX vs. FEUPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLMIX
HLMIX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
HLMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
HLMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FEUPX
FEUPX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FEUPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEUPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEUPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FEUPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEUPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLMIX vs. FEUPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio (HLMIX) and American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class F-3 (FEUPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLMIXFEUPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

2.28

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.63

8.57

+2.06

HLMIX vs. FEUPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the FEUPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLMIX and FEUPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLMIXFEUPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

1.85

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.31

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.52

-0.15

Drawdowns

HLMIX vs. FEUPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLMIX drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, which is greater than FEUPX's maximum drawdown of -37.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLMIX and FEUPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLMIXFEUPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.03%

-37.31%

-20.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.44%

-12.52%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.98%

-15.62%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.76%

-37.31%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.81%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.70%

-10.67%

-2.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

3.32%

-0.59%

Volatility

HLMIX vs. FEUPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio (HLMIX) is 5.14%, while American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class F-3 (FEUPX) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that HLMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEUPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLMIXFEUPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

5.53%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.09%

12.95%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.50%

15.41%

-0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.94%

16.67%

-0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.49%

17.07%

-0.58%

HLMIX vs. FEUPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLMIX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FEUPX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLMIX vs. FEUPX - Dividend Comparison

HLMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.04%, more than FEUPX's 12.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEUPX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class F-3
12.51%13.94%4.96%3.94%2.02%10.18%0.40%3.14%3.17%3.28%0.00%0.00%
HLMIX
Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio
13.04%14.94%7.14%3.79%2.51%2.48%0.75%1.59%1.50%1.64%0.98%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, HLMIX and FEUPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FEUPX has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to HLMIX (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLMIX dropped -58.03% vs FEUPX's -37.31%.

HLMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLMIX and FEUPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer