PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLIPX vs. SEEGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLIPX vs. SEEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund (HLIPX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLIPX achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly lower than SEEGX's 0.51% return. Over the past 10 years, HLIPX has underperformed SEEGX with an annualized return of 2.07%, while SEEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.63% annualized return.


HLIPX

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.96%
6M
-0.93%
YTD
-0.53%
1Y
2.23%
3Y*
4.81%
5Y*
0.26%
10Y*
2.07%
ALL TIME*
4.52%

SEEGX

1D
1.77%
1M
-2.07%
6M
2.39%
YTD
0.51%
1Y
5.03%
3Y*
19.07%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
18.63%
ALL TIME*
11.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

HLIPX vs. SEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLIPX
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund
-0.53%7.98%2.64%6.38%-12.69%-0.30%7.93%8.73%0.01%4.26%
SEEGX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund
0.51%14.08%35.14%34.62%-25.40%18.17%56.02%39.13%0.50%38.03%

Correlation

The correlation between HLIPX and SEEGX is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 1993

-0.04

The correlation between HLIPX and SEEGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLIPX vs. SEEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HLIPX
HLIPX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
HLIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
HLIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

SEEGX
SEEGX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SEEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SEEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HLIPX vs. SEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund (HLIPX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HLIPXSEEGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.08

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

0.43

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.83

1.14

+0.68

HLIPX vs. SEEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLIPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is higher than the SEEGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLIPX and SEEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HLIPX vs. SEEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLIPX drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, smaller than the maximum SEEGX drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLIPX and SEEGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLIPXSEEGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.91%

-62.09%

+45.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-16.82%

+13.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.95%

-21.50%

+16.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.91%

-31.23%

+14.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.91%

-31.85%

+14.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.64%

-6.80%

+4.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-16.84%

+14.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

6.29%

-4.99%

Volatility

HLIPX vs. SEEGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund (HLIPX) is 1.04%, while JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that HLIPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLIPXSEEGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

8.10%

-7.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.04%

15.37%

-12.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.78%

19.00%

-15.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.70%

20.76%

-15.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.65%

21.84%

-17.19%

HLIPX vs. SEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLIPX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than SEEGX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLIPX vs. SEEGX - Dividend Comparison

HLIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than SEEGX's 11.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLIPX
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund
4.26%4.86%4.88%4.02%3.36%3.25%4.36%3.23%3.08%2.83%2.77%3.25%
SEEGX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund
11.38%11.44%2.00%0.12%3.42%14.92%5.27%12.85%15.97%14.79%9.88%4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


HLIPX and SEEGX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEEGX has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to HLIPX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLIPX dropped -16.91% vs SEEGX's -62.09%.

HLIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLIPX and SEEGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer