PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLIEX vs. NEIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLIEX vs. NEIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Equity Income Fund (HLIEX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLIEX achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly lower than NEIMX's 17.46% return. Over the past 10 years, HLIEX has outperformed NEIMX with an annualized return of 12.04%, while NEIMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.35% annualized return.


HLIEX

1D
-0.26%
1M
2.38%
YTD
10.02%
6M
10.61%
1Y
22.94%
3Y*
17.86%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
12.04%

NEIMX

1D
0.14%
1M
3.98%
YTD
17.46%
6M
17.48%
1Y
34.72%
3Y*
19.62%
5Y*
11.97%
10Y*
10.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLIEX vs. NEIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLIEX
JPMorgan Equity Income Fund
10.02%14.67%19.67%4.79%-1.88%25.10%3.61%26.30%-4.45%17.55%
NEIMX
Neiman Large Cap Value Fund
17.46%18.68%13.50%6.15%-5.16%23.85%-5.97%23.49%-9.76%19.00%

Correlation

The correlation between HLIEX and NEIMX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2003

0.90

The correlation between HLIEX and NEIMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.91 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLIEX vs. NEIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLIEX
HLIEX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
HLIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
HLIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

NEIMX
NEIMX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NEIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
NEIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLIEX vs. NEIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Equity Income Fund (HLIEX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLIEXNEIMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.63

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

6.03

-2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.18

25.19

-13.01

HLIEX vs. NEIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLIEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is lower than the NEIMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLIEX and NEIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLIEXNEIMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

3.41

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.02

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.03

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.03

+0.54

Drawdowns

HLIEX vs. NEIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLIEX drawdown since its inception was -50.33%, smaller than the maximum NEIMX drawdown of -92.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLIEX and NEIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLIEXNEIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.33%

-92.94%

+42.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-5.75%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.19%

-92.94%

+78.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.85%

-92.94%

+78.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.89%

-92.94%

+56.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-88.97%

+88.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.37%

-10.52%

+4.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.37%

+0.48%

Volatility

HLIEX vs. NEIMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Equity Income Fund (HLIEX) is 2.45%, while Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that HLIEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLIEXNEIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

2.65%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.78%

7.77%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.32%

10.18%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.30%

576.30%

-562.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.79%

407.62%

-390.83%

HLIEX vs. NEIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLIEX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than NEIMX's 1.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLIEX vs. NEIMX - Dividend Comparison

HLIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.83%, more than NEIMX's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLIEX
JPMorgan Equity Income Fund
9.83%10.81%14.41%2.77%3.67%3.33%1.82%2.78%5.12%2.47%2.45%2.73%
NEIMX
Neiman Large Cap Value Fund
0.65%0.76%1.10%1.36%3.60%17.65%1.20%2.26%1.20%6.64%10.20%4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


HLIEX and NEIMX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEIMX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to HLIEX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLIEX dropped -50.33% vs NEIMX's -92.94%.

NEIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLIEX and NEIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer