PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLFMX vs. THDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLFMX vs. THDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) and Thornburg Developing World Fund (THDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLFMX achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly lower than THDIX's 27.57% return. Over the past 10 years, HLFMX has underperformed THDIX with an annualized return of 3.91%, while THDIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.29% annualized return.


HLFMX

1D
0.66%
1M
0.22%
YTD
2.80%
6M
3.93%
1Y
13.21%
3Y*
11.74%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
3.91%

THDIX

1D
0.91%
1M
8.91%
YTD
27.57%
6M
31.97%
1Y
50.49%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
4.79%
10Y*
9.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLFMX vs. THDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLFMX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund
2.80%16.95%8.76%10.43%-18.91%10.18%0.11%10.88%-15.45%25.08%
THDIX
Thornburg Developing World Fund
27.57%27.84%5.80%6.61%-25.52%-2.67%22.98%29.95%-14.88%35.86%

Correlation

The correlation between HLFMX and THDIX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.60

The correlation between HLFMX and THDIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLFMX vs. THDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLFMX
HLFMX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
HLFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
HLFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

THDIX
THDIX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
THDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
THDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
THDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
THDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLFMX vs. THDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) and Thornburg Developing World Fund (THDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLFMXTHDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.54

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

4.35

-3.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.51

16.72

-13.21

HLFMX vs. THDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLFMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the THDIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLFMX and THDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLFMXTHDIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

3.10

-1.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.29

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.54

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.46

-0.38

Drawdowns

HLFMX vs. THDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLFMX drawdown since its inception was -63.95%, which is greater than THDIX's maximum drawdown of -44.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLFMX and THDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLFMXTHDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.95%

-44.31%

-19.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.09%

-11.76%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.79%

-16.09%

+4.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.37%

-40.70%

+12.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.61%

-44.31%

-2.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.61%

0.00%

-6.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.26%

-13.44%

-5.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

3.05%

+0.88%

Volatility

HLFMX vs. THDIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) is 3.67%, while Thornburg Developing World Fund (THDIX) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that HLFMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLFMXTHDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

5.79%

-2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.19%

13.42%

-3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.76%

16.47%

-4.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.48%

16.64%

-6.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.91%

17.11%

-5.20%

HLFMX vs. THDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLFMX has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than THDIX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLFMX vs. THDIX - Dividend Comparison

HLFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than THDIX's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLFMX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund
3.47%3.56%1.88%1.77%2.28%0.83%1.61%1.97%1.34%1.90%1.01%1.13%
THDIX
Thornburg Developing World Fund
2.76%3.52%2.90%2.05%1.77%0.00%0.15%1.52%1.31%0.74%0.55%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


HLFMX and THDIX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THDIX has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to HLFMX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLFMX dropped -63.95% vs THDIX's -44.31%.

THDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLFMX and THDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer