HLFMX vs. LZEMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX).
HLFMX is managed by Harding Loevner. It was launched on May 26, 2008. LZEMX is managed by Lazard. It was launched on Jul 14, 1994.
Performance
HLFMX vs. LZEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HLFMX vs. LZEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLFMX Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund | -0.11% | 16.95% | 8.76% | 10.43% | -18.91% | 10.18% | 0.11% | 10.88% | -15.45% | 25.08% |
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio | 6.61% | 41.35% | 7.60% | 22.44% | -14.86% | 5.37% | -0.07% | 18.06% | -18.11% | 28.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLFMX achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than LZEMX's 6.61% return. Over the past 10 years, HLFMX has underperformed LZEMX with an annualized return of 4.15%, while LZEMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.39% annualized return.
HLFMX
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -5.71%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 3.25%
- 1Y
- 15.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.57%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- 4.15%
LZEMX
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -7.29%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 16.90%
- 1Y
- 40.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HLFMX vs. LZEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLFMX has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than LZEMX's 1.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HLFMX vs. LZEMX — Risk / Return Rank
HLFMX
LZEMX
HLFMX vs. LZEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLFMX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | 2.95 | -1.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 3.72 | -1.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.57 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 3.86 | -2.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.03 | 14.21 | -9.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLFMX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 2.95 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.78 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.58 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.39 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between HLFMX and LZEMX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HLFMX vs. LZEMX - Dividend Comparison
HLFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than LZEMX's 1.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLFMX Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund | 3.57% | 3.56% | 1.88% | 1.77% | 2.28% | 0.83% | 1.61% | 1.97% | 1.34% | 1.90% | 1.01% | 1.13% |
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio | 1.92% | 2.05% | 3.11% | 3.76% | 5.92% | 4.89% | 2.11% | 2.45% | 2.10% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 2.14% |
Drawdowns
HLFMX vs. LZEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLFMX drawdown since its inception was -63.95%, which is greater than LZEMX's maximum drawdown of -60.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLFMX and LZEMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLFMX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.95% | -60.08% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.09% | -10.42% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.37% | -30.55% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.61% | -44.08% | -2.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.26% | -9.04% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.38% | -16.71% | -2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 2.89% | +0.22% |
Volatility
HLFMX vs. LZEMX - Volatility Comparison
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) at 6.23%. This indicates that HLFMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LZEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HLFMX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 6.23% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.72% | 9.72% | -1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.03% | 14.30% | -2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.23% | 14.11% | -3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.79% | 16.34% | -4.55% |