PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLFMX vs. HIEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HLFMX vs. HIEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) and Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (HIEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HLFMX vs. HIEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLFMX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund
-0.11%16.95%8.76%10.43%-18.91%10.18%0.11%10.88%-15.45%25.08%
HIEMX
Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
-10.51%21.39%-8.26%0.39%-23.26%-6.34%15.71%18.35%-14.37%34.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLFMX achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly higher than HIEMX's -10.51% return. Over the past 10 years, HLFMX has outperformed HIEMX with an annualized return of 4.15%, while HIEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.15% annualized return.


HLFMX

1D
2.06%
1M
-5.71%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
3.25%
1Y
15.51%
3Y*
11.57%
5Y*
4.87%
10Y*
4.15%

HIEMX

1D
0.26%
1M
-7.79%
YTD
-10.51%
6M
-9.98%
1Y
4.66%
3Y*
-0.41%
5Y*
-7.18%
10Y*
1.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HLFMX vs. HIEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLFMX has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HIEMX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HLFMX vs. HIEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLFMX
HLFMX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
HLFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HLFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

HIEMX
HIEMX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
HIEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
HIEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLFMX vs. HIEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) and Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (HIEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLFMXHIEMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

0.31

+1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.85

0.54

+1.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.07

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

0.31

+1.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.03

1.25

+3.79

HLFMX vs. HIEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLFMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the HIEMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLFMX and HIEMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLFMXHIEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

0.31

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

-0.47

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.07

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.25

-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between HLFMX and HIEMX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HLFMX vs. HIEMX - Dividend Comparison

HLFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than HIEMX's 2.11% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLFMX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund
3.57%3.56%1.88%1.77%2.28%0.83%1.61%1.97%1.34%1.90%1.01%1.13%
HIEMX
Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
2.11%1.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%23.24%0.63%2.05%3.83%0.70%0.44%0.94%

Drawdowns

HLFMX vs. HIEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLFMX drawdown since its inception was -63.95%, which is greater than HIEMX's maximum drawdown of -58.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLFMX and HIEMX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HLFMXHIEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.95%

-58.48%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.09%

-17.19%

+6.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.37%

-41.42%

+13.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.61%

-44.22%

-2.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.26%

-35.69%

+26.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.38%

-17.52%

-1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

4.30%

-1.19%

Volatility

HLFMX vs. HIEMX - Volatility Comparison

Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) and Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (HIEMX) have volatilities of 6.73% and 6.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HLFMXHIEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.73%

6.63%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.72%

11.19%

-2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.03%

16.10%

-4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.23%

15.31%

-5.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.79%

16.09%

-4.30%