PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLFMX vs. ESCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLFMX vs. ESCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund (ESCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLFMX achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly lower than ESCIX's 8.91% return. Over the past 10 years, HLFMX has underperformed ESCIX with an annualized return of 3.91%, while ESCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.82% annualized return.


HLFMX

1D
0.66%
1M
0.22%
YTD
2.80%
6M
3.93%
1Y
13.21%
3Y*
11.74%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
3.91%

ESCIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
8.91%
6M
10.18%
1Y
27.86%
3Y*
15.58%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*
9.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLFMX vs. ESCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLFMX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund
2.80%16.95%8.76%10.43%-18.91%10.18%0.11%10.88%-15.45%25.08%
ESCIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund
8.91%26.07%3.55%19.64%-24.45%11.93%43.41%15.24%-22.01%28.57%

Correlation

The correlation between HLFMX and ESCIX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2011

0.54

The correlation between HLFMX and ESCIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.55 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLFMX vs. ESCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLFMX
HLFMX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
HLFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
HLFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

ESCIX
ESCIX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ESCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ESCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLFMX vs. ESCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund (ESCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLFMXESCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.57

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

5.31

-4.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.51

19.40

-15.89

HLFMX vs. ESCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLFMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the ESCIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLFMX and ESCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLFMXESCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

2.63

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.32

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.56

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.39

-0.31

Drawdowns

HLFMX vs. ESCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLFMX drawdown since its inception was -63.95%, which is greater than ESCIX's maximum drawdown of -48.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLFMX and ESCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLFMXESCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.95%

-48.76%

-15.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.09%

-5.70%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.79%

-19.97%

+8.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.37%

-36.59%

+8.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.61%

-48.76%

+2.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.61%

-0.74%

-5.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.26%

-13.33%

-5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

1.52%

+2.41%

Volatility

HLFMX vs. ESCIX - Volatility Comparison

Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund (ESCIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that HLFMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLFMXESCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

0.00%

+3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.19%

7.42%

+2.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.76%

11.53%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.48%

15.66%

-5.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.91%

17.60%

-5.69%

HLFMX vs. ESCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLFMX has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ESCIX's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLFMX vs. ESCIX - Dividend Comparison

HLFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than ESCIX's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESCIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund
0.42%0.91%0.00%0.56%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.11%1.66%1.16%0.00%
HLFMX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund
3.47%3.56%1.88%1.77%2.28%0.83%1.61%1.97%1.34%1.90%1.01%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


HLFMX and ESCIX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HLFMX has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to ESCIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLFMX dropped -63.95% vs ESCIX's -48.76%.

ESCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLFMX and ESCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer