PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLFMX vs. EMPTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HLFMX vs. EMPTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) and UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLFMX achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly lower than EMPTX's 30.32% return.


HLFMX

1D
-0.54%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
2.24%
6M
3.25%
1Y
12.46%
3Y*
11.53%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
3.85%

EMPTX

1D
-0.15%
1M
9.50%
YTD
30.32%
6M
34.06%
1Y
66.26%
3Y*
26.91%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLFMX vs. EMPTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HLFMX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund
2.24%16.95%8.76%10.43%-18.91%10.18%0.11%10.88%-14.48%
EMPTX
UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund
30.32%43.82%2.51%8.92%-25.38%-9.36%24.79%14.98%0.55%

Correlation

The correlation between HLFMX and EMPTX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2018

0.54

The correlation between HLFMX and EMPTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLFMX vs. EMPTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLFMX
HLFMX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
HLFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
HLFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

EMPTX
EMPTX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EMPTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMPTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMPTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EMPTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMPTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLFMX vs. EMPTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) and UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLFMXEMPTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.71

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

5.17

-4.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.20

20.42

-17.23

HLFMX vs. EMPTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLFMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the EMPTX Sharpe Ratio of 4.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLFMX and EMPTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLFMXEMPTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

4.00

-2.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.35

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.49

-0.41

Drawdowns

HLFMX vs. EMPTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLFMX drawdown since its inception was -63.95%, which is greater than EMPTX's maximum drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLFMX and EMPTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLFMXEMPTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.95%

-46.03%

-17.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.09%

-14.50%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.79%

-15.50%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.37%

-41.46%

+13.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.12%

-0.15%

-6.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.25%

-18.36%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

3.54%

+0.41%

Volatility

HLFMX vs. EMPTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) is 3.71%, while UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that HLFMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMPTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLFMXEMPTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

7.65%

-3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

16.05%

-5.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.71%

18.72%

-7.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.48%

19.28%

-8.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.91%

19.36%

-7.45%

HLFMX vs. EMPTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLFMX has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EMPTX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

HLFMX vs. EMPTX - Dividend Comparison

HLFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, more than EMPTX's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMPTX
UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund
1.47%1.91%3.40%3.20%3.84%11.93%1.50%2.75%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HLFMX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund
3.48%3.56%1.88%1.77%2.28%0.83%1.61%1.97%1.34%1.90%1.01%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


HLFMX and EMPTX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMPTX has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to HLFMX (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLFMX dropped -63.95% vs EMPTX's -46.03%.

EMPTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLFMX and EMPTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer