HKXCY vs. CME
HKXCY (Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing) and CME (CME Group Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Financial Data & Stock Exchanges industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, HKXCY returned 10.74%/yr vs 14.32%/yr for CME. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
HKXCY vs. CME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HKXCY achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly higher than CME's 0.93% return. Over the past 10 years, HKXCY has underperformed CME with an annualized return of 10.74%, while CME has yielded a comparatively higher 14.32% annualized return.
HKXCY
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 10.16%
- 6M
- -3.94%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 0.82%
- 3Y*
- 11.37%
- 5Y*
- -1.53%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.32%
CME
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 13.18%
- 6M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- -0.91%
- 3Y*
- 15.08%
- 5Y*
- 9.26%
- 10Y*
- 14.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $710.10M | $709.21M | $863.92M | |
| $8.95M | $9.01M | $10.42M |
HKXCY vs. CME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HKXCY Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing | 1.26% | 42.70% | 13.43% | -18.00% | -25.90% | 10.33% | 71.84% | 16.07% | -4.44% | 34.85% |
CME CME Group Inc. | 0.93% | 19.83% | 15.41% | 31.32% | -22.89% | 29.47% | -6.34% | 9.67% | 32.15% | 32.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between HKXCY and CME is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2008 | 0.16 |
The correlation between HKXCY and CME shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HKXCY:
$65.67B
CME:
$96.29B
HKXCY:
HK$14.88
CME:
$11.82
HKXCY:
27.39
CME:
22.66
HKXCY:
2.49
CME:
1.98
HKXCY:
17.93
CME:
14.29
HKXCY:
9.38
CME:
3.66
HKXCY:
HK$28.82B
CME:
$6.77B
HKXCY:
HK$24.52B
CME:
$5.55B
HKXCY:
HK$26.24B
CME:
$5.37B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HKXCY vs. CME — Risk / Return Rank
HKXCY
CME
HKXCY vs. CME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing (HKXCY) and CME Group Inc. (CME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HKXCY | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.02 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | -0.00 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | -0.00 | -0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HKXCY vs. CME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HKXCY drawdown since its inception was -62.49%, smaller than the maximum CME drawdown of -77.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HKXCY and CME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HKXCY | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.49% | -77.50% | +15.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.07% | -31.09% | +11.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.76% | -31.09% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.49% | -31.74% | -27.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.49% | -37.36% | -25.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.38% | -15.58% | -2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.91% | -20.69% | -2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.79% | 10.72% | -0.93% |
Volatility
HKXCY vs. CME - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing (HKXCY) is 3.44%, while CME Group Inc. (CME) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that HKXCY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HKXCY | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.44% | 7.71% | -4.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.88% | 19.93% | -5.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.40% | 23.51% | -2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.76% | 20.66% | +14.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.33% | 24.14% | +7.19% |
Dividends
HKXCY vs. CME - Dividend Comparison
HKXCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than CME's 4.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CME CME Group Inc. | 4.20% | 1.83% | 4.48% | 4.58% | 5.05% | 3.00% | 3.24% | 2.74% | 2.42% | 4.20% | 4.90% | 5.41% |
HKXCY Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing | 3.08% | 2.68% | 2.82% | 3.05% | 2.27% | 1.99% | 1.40% | 2.37% | 2.56% | 2.60% | 5.54% | 2.59% |
Financials
HKXCY vs. CME - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing and CME Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HKXCY vs. CME - Profitability Comparison
HKXCY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing reported a gross profit of 7.15B and revenue of 8.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.9%.
CME - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CME Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 1.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.3%.
HKXCY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing reported an operating income of 6.30B and revenue of 8.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 76.6%.
CME - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CME Group Inc. reported an operating income of 1.11B and revenue of 1.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 64.9%.
HKXCY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing reported a net income of 5.20B and revenue of 8.23B, resulting in a net margin of 63.3%.
CME - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CME Group Inc. reported a net income of 1.04B and revenue of 1.71B, resulting in a net margin of 61.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HKXCY and CME have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CME has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to HKXCY (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HKXCY dropped -62.49% vs CME's -77.50%.
CME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.00 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HKXCY and CME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer