HKOR.L vs. FLRK.L
HKOR.L (HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD) and FLRK.L (Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds tracking the MSCI Korea NR USD, from HSBC and Franklin Templeton respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HKOR.L returned 19.90%/yr vs 20.63%/yr for FLRK.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HKOR.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLRK.L.
Performance
HKOR.L vs. FLRK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HKOR.L is traded in GBp, while FLRK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLRK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HKOR.L having a 107.38% return and FLRK.L slightly higher at 111.17%.
HKOR.L
- 1D
- -4.88%
- 1M
- 17.29%
- YTD
- 107.38%
- 6M
- 126.00%
- 1Y
- 237.99%
- 3Y*
- 45.20%
- 5Y*
- 19.90%
- 10Y*
- 17.97%
FLRK.L
- 1D
- -5.06%
- 1M
- 19.12%
- YTD
- 111.17%
- 6M
- 129.46%
- 1Y
- 234.17%
- 3Y*
- 46.37%
- 5Y*
- 20.63%
- 10Y*
- —
HKOR.L vs. FLRK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HKOR.L HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD | 107.38% | 86.42% | -21.81% | 13.46% | -19.95% | -7.35% | 40.21% | 10.07% |
FLRK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 111.17% | 82.09% | -20.56% | 14.16% | -19.37% | -5.90% | 42.60% | -14.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between HKOR.L and FLRK.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2019 | 0.98 |
The correlation between HKOR.L and FLRK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
HKOR.L vs. FLRK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HKOR.L
FLRK.L
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
HKOR.L
FLRK.L
Industrials
HKOR.L
FLRK.L
Financial Services
HKOR.L
FLRK.L
Consumer Cyclical
HKOR.L
FLRK.L
Healthcare
HKOR.L
FLRK.L
Communication Services
HKOR.L
FLRK.L
Basic Materials
HKOR.L
FLRK.L
Consumer Defensive
HKOR.L
FLRK.L
Energy
HKOR.L
FLRK.L
Utilities
HKOR.L
FLRK.L
Real Estate
HKOR.L
-
FLRK.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HKOR.L vs. FLRK.L — Risk / Return Rank
HKOR.L
FLRK.L
HKOR.L vs. FLRK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (HKOR.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HKOR.L | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.84 | 1.85 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.12 | 10.98 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.48 | 39.30 | +0.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HKOR.L | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.39 | 6.24 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.81 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.67 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
HKOR.L vs. FLRK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HKOR.L drawdown since its inception was -44.41%, which is greater than FLRK.L's maximum drawdown of -41.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HKOR.L and FLRK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HKOR.L | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.41% | -41.57% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.26% | -21.18% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.09% | -27.82% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.86% | -38.68% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.40% | -5.62% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.72% | -19.95% | +4.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.00% | 5.93% | +0.07% |
Volatility
HKOR.L vs. FLRK.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (HKOR.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) have volatilities of 17.73% and 18.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HKOR.L | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.73% | 18.09% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.16% | 32.92% | -0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.01% | 37.31% | -0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 25.31% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.24% | 27.31% | -3.07% |
HKOR.L vs. FLRK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HKOR.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRK.L's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
HKOR.L vs. FLRK.L - Dividend Comparison
HKOR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while FLRK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HKOR.L HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD | 0.35% | 0.69% | 1.51% | 1.11% | 0.71% | 0.59% | 0.02% | 0.29% | 0.53% | 0.11% | 0.13% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, HKOR.L and FLRK.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FLRK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLRK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HKOR.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI Korea NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HKOR.L and 0.09% for FLRK.L.
Find the right allocation for HKOR.L and FLRK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer