HJEN vs. ACES

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

HJEN (Direxion Hydrogen ETF) and ACES (ALPS Clean Energy ETF) are both Alternative Energy Equities funds - HJEN tracks the Indxx Hydrogen Economy Index - Benchmark TR Net while ACES tracks the CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HJEN charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ACES.

Performance

HJEN vs. ACES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Hydrogen ETF (HJEN) and ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HJEN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACES

• 1D: -1.28%
• 1M: -9.81%
• 6M: -2.52%
• YTD: 2.71%
• 1Y: 22.77%
• 3Y*: -10.19%
• 5Y*: -13.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HJEN vs. ACES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HJEN Direxion Hydrogen ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-10.90%	-8.69%	-33.27%	-11.04%
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF	2.71%	25.44%	-26.71%	-20.04%	-28.44%	-10.11%

Correlation

The correlation between HJEN and ACES is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2021	0.63

The correlation between HJEN and ACES shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HJEN vs. ACES - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HJEN	ACES
Industrials	22.7%	21.6%
Technology	16.5%	30.1%
Basic Materials	9.2%	7.3%
Energy	8.3%	0.4%
Financial Services	3.3%	4.4%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.5%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	23.8%

Return for Risk

HJEN vs. ACES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HJEN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ACES

ACES Risk / Return Rank: 23
ACES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
ACES Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
ACES Omega Ratio Rank: 21
ACES Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
ACES Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HJEN vs. ACES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Hydrogen ETF (HJEN) and ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HJEN	ACES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.62	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.05	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.13	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.94	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.42	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	HJEN	ACES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-79.05%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-22.50%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-58.68%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-74.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-65.22%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-39.14%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.75%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HJEN	ACES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.47%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	25.33%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	34.06%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	36.57%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	35.70%	—

HJEN vs. ACES - Expense Ratio Comparison

HJEN has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ACES's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

HJEN vs. ACES - Dividend Comparison

HJEN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF	0.67%	0.70%	1.10%	1.44%	1.08%	0.71%	0.56%	1.79%	0.34%
HJEN Direxion Hydrogen ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.91%	1.50%	1.24%	0.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HJEN and ACES in my portfolio?

HJEN and ACES have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HJEN or ACES?

On fees, HJEN is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HJEN or ACES?

HJEN is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ACES.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HJEN or ACES?

ACES has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for HJEN.

What is the main difference between HJEN and ACES?

HJEN tracks Indxx Hydrogen Economy Index - Benchmark TR Net, while ACES tracks CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HJEN and 0.55% for ACES.