PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIWS.L vs. HWWA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIWS.L vs. HWWA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc (HIWS.L) and HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIWS.L achieves a 21.23% return, which is significantly higher than HWWA.L's 13.69% return.


HIWS.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
11.29%
YTD
21.23%
6M
21.33%
1Y
40.60%
3Y*
17.16%
5Y*
10Y*

HWWA.L

1D
-0.33%
1M
5.53%
YTD
13.69%
6M
14.69%
1Y
34.30%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*
13.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIWS.L vs. HWWA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HIWS.L
HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc
21.23%13.05%8.10%19.20%-3.08%
HWWA.L
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF
13.69%16.74%17.83%15.71%-2.73%

Correlation

The correlation between HIWS.L and HWWA.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2022

0.89

The correlation between HIWS.L and HWWA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIWS.L vs. HWWA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIWS.L
HIWS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
HIWS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIWS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIWS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HIWS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIWS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

HWWA.L
HWWA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HWWA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWWA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIWS.L vs. HWWA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc (HIWS.L) and HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIWS.LHWWA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.64

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.52

5.06

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.89

21.35

-1.46

HIWS.L vs. HWWA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIWS.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is comparable to the HWWA.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIWS.L and HWWA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIWS.LHWWA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09

3.34

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.83

+0.38

Drawdowns

HIWS.L vs. HWWA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIWS.L drawdown since its inception was -21.14%, smaller than the maximum HWWA.L drawdown of -25.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIWS.L and HWWA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIWS.LHWWA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.14%

-25.12%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.33%

-6.74%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.14%

-16.79%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.35%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-3.53%

+0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

1.60%

+0.44%

Volatility

HIWS.L vs. HWWA.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc (HIWS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) at 3.48%. This indicates that HIWS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWWA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIWS.LHWWA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

3.48%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.08%

7.85%

+2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.06%

10.23%

+2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.72%

12.69%

+1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.72%

14.32%

-0.60%

HIWS.L vs. HWWA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIWS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than HWWA.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIWS.L vs. HWWA.L - Dividend Comparison

HIWS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HWWA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIWS.L
HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HWWA.L
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF
1.29%1.43%1.58%1.95%2.07%1.48%1.45%2.07%2.10%1.86%1.71%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIWS.L and HWWA.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HWWA.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HWWA.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HIWS.L.

HIWS.L tracks MSCI World Islamic Universal Screened Select Index, while HWWA.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HIWS.L and 0.25% for HWWA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIWS.L and HWWA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer