PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIWO.L vs. MVEW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIWO.L vs. MVEW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (HIWO.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HIWO.L is traded in USD, while MVEW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MVEW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIWO.L achieves a 21.27% return, which is significantly higher than MVEW.L's 0.13% return.


HIWO.L

1D
-0.40%
1M
10.42%
YTD
21.27%
6M
22.01%
1Y
39.21%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
10Y*

MVEW.L

1D
0.25%
1M
1.11%
YTD
0.13%
6M
0.88%
1Y
2.29%
3Y*
9.39%
5Y*
5.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIWO.L vs. MVEW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HIWO.L
HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
21.27%20.87%6.39%26.10%-4.68%
MVEW.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.13%11.56%10.57%9.48%-2.08%

Correlation

The correlation between HIWO.L and MVEW.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2022

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between HIWO.L and MVEW.L has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIWO.L vs. MVEW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIWO.L
HIWO.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
HIWO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIWO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIWO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HIWO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIWO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

MVEW.L
MVEW.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MVEW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIWO.L vs. MVEW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (HIWO.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIWO.LMVEW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.05

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.34

0.35

+3.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.37

0.99

+15.38

HIWO.L vs. MVEW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIWO.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the MVEW.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIWO.L and MVEW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIWO.LMVEW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

0.28

+2.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.64

+0.19

Drawdowns

HIWO.L vs. MVEW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIWO.L drawdown since its inception was -22.45%, which is greater than MVEW.L's maximum drawdown of -21.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIWO.L and MVEW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIWO.LMVEW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.45%

-21.36%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-6.44%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.45%

-8.56%

-13.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-3.33%

+2.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.48%

-4.32%

+1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

2.31%

+0.08%

Volatility

HIWO.L vs. MVEW.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (HIWO.L) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) at 1.91%. This indicates that HIWO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVEW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIWO.LMVEW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

1.91%

+4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.77%

5.82%

+6.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.55%

8.09%

+7.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.66%

11.19%

+12.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.66%

11.30%

+12.36%

HIWO.L vs. MVEW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HIWO.L and MVEW.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Dividends

HIWO.L vs. MVEW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HIWO.L nor MVEW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HIWO.L and MVEW.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HIWO.L and MVEW.L have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

HIWO.L tracks MSCI World Islamic Universal Screened Select Index, while MVEW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIWO.L and MVEW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer